Literature DB >> 11781162

Prediction of estrogen receptor binding for 58,000 chemicals using an integrated system of a tree-based model with structural alerts.

Huixiao Hong1, Weida Tong, Hong Fang, Leming Shi, Qian Xie, Jie Wu, Roger Perkins, John D Walker, William Branham, Daniel M Sheehan.   

Abstract

A number of environmental chemicals, by mimicking natural hormones, can disrupt endocrine function in experimental animals, wildlife, and humans. These chemicals, called "endocrine-disrupting chemicals" (EDCs), are such a scientific and public concern that screening and testing 58,000 chemicals for EDC activities is now statutorily mandated. Computational chemistry tools are important to biologists because they identify chemicals most important for in vitro and in vivo studies. Here we used a computational approach with integration of two rejection filters, a tree-based model, and three structural alerts to predict and prioritize estrogen receptor (ER) ligands. The models were developed using data for 232 structurally diverse chemicals (training set) with a 10(6) range of relative binding affinities (RBAs); we then validated the models by predicting ER RBAs for 463 chemicals that had ER activity data (testing set). The integrated model gave a lower false negative rate than any single component for both training and testing sets. When the integrated model was applied to approximately 58,000 potential EDCs, 80% (approximately 46,000 chemicals) were predicted to have negligible potential (log RBA < -4.5, with log RBA = 2.0 for estradiol) to bind ER. The ability to process large numbers of chemicals to predict inactivity for ER binding and to categorically prioritize the remainder provides one biologic measure to prioritize chemicals for entry into more expensive assays (most chemicals have no biologic data of any kind). The general approach for predicting ER binding reported here may be applied to other receptors and/or reversible binding mechanisms involved in endocrine disruption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11781162      PMCID: PMC1240690          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0211029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  20 in total

1.  Chemical selection by the Interagency Testing Committee: use of computerized substructure searching to identify chemical groups for health effects, chemical fate and ecological effects testing.

Authors:  J D Walker
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: structural diversity of ligands.

Authors:  R M Blair; H Fang; W S Branham; B S Hass; S L Dial; C L Moland; W Tong; L Shi; R Perkins; D M Sheehan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens.

Authors:  L M Shi; H Fang; W Tong; J Wu; R Perkins; R M Blair; W S Branham; S L Dial; C L Moland; D M Sheehan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

4.  Genetic algorithms: principles of natural selection applied to computation.

Authors:  S Forrest
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Comparison of estrogen receptor alpha and beta subtypes based on comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA).

Authors:  L Xing; W J Welsh; W Tong; R Perkins; D M Sheehan
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Structure-activity relationships for a large diverse set of natural, synthetic, and environmental estrogens.

Authors:  H Fang; W Tong; L M Shi; R Blair; R Perkins; W Branham; B S Hass; Q Xie; S L Dial; C L Moland; D M Sheehan
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 7.  The estradiol pharmacophore: ligand structure-estrogen receptor binding affinity relationships and a model for the receptor binding site.

Authors:  G M Anstead; K E Carlson; J A Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 8.  Comparative toxicology of chlordecone (Kepone) in humans and experimental animals.

Authors:  P S Guzelian
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 9.  Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop.

Authors:  R J Kavlock; G P Daston; C DeRosa; P Fenner-Crisp; L E Gray; S Kaattari; G Lucier; M Luster; M J Mac; C Maczka; R Miller; J Moore; R Rolland; G Scott; D M Sheehan; T Sinks; H A Tilson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Quantitative comparisons of in vitro assays for estrogenic activities.

Authors:  H Fang; W Tong; R Perkins; A M Soto; N V Prechtl; D M Sheehan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  21 in total

1.  Free energies of ligand binding for structurally diverse compounds.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Predictive Modeling of Estrogen Receptor Binding Agents Using Advanced Cheminformatics Tools and Massive Public Data.

Authors:  Kathryn Ribay; Marlene T Kim; Wenyi Wang; Daniel Pinolini; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Front Environ Sci       Date:  2016-03-08

3.  Prediction of binding affinity for estrogen receptor alpha modulators using statistical learning approaches.

Authors:  Yonghua Wang; Yan Li; Jun Ding; Yuan Wang; Yaqing Chang
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 2.943

4.  The EDKB: an established knowledge base for endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Don Ding; Lei Xu; Hong Fang; Huixiao Hong; Roger Perkins; Steve Harris; Edward D Bearden; Leming Shi; Weida Tong
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 5.  Large effects from small exposures. I. Mechanisms for endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity.

Authors:  Wade V Welshons; Kristina A Thayer; Barbara M Judy; Julia A Taylor; Edward M Curran; Frederick S vom Saal
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Estrogenic activity of styrene oligomers after metabolic activation by rat liver microsomes.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Kitamura; Motoko Ohmegi; Seigo Sanoh; Kazumi Sugihara; Shin'ichi Yoshihara; Nariaki Fujimoto; Shigeru Ohta
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict ecologic effects and environmental fate of chemical substances.

Authors:  Mark T D Cronin; John D Walker; Joanna S Jaworska; Michael H I Comber; Christopher D Watts; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships predicting the antioxidant potency of 17β-estradiol-related polycyclic phenols to inhibit lipid peroxidation.

Authors:  Laszlo Prokai; Nilka M Rivera-Portalatin; Katalin Prokai-Tatrai
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Revealing Adverse Outcome Pathways from Public High-Throughput Screening Data to Evaluate New Toxicants by a Knowledge-Based Deep Neural Network Approach.

Authors:  Heather L Ciallella; Daniel P Russo; Lauren M Aleksunes; Fabian A Grimm; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 11.357

10.  Assessment of prediction confidence and domain extrapolation of two structure-activity relationship models for predicting estrogen receptor binding activity.

Authors:  Weida Tong; Qian Xie; Huixiao Hong; Leming Shi; Hong Fang; Roger Perkins
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.