Literature DB >> 10964792

Quantitative comparisons of in vitro assays for estrogenic activities.

H Fang1, W Tong, R Perkins, A M Soto, N V Prechtl, D M Sheehan.   

Abstract

Substances that may act as estrogens show a broad chemical structural diversity. To thoroughly address the question of possible adverse estrogenic effects, reliable methods are needed to detect and identify the chemicals of these diverse structural classes. We compared three assays--in vitro estrogen receptor competitive binding assays (ER binding assays), yeast-based reporter gene assays (yeast assays), and the MCF-7 cell proliferation assay (E-SCREEN assay)--to determine their quantitative agreement in identifying structurally diverse estrogens. We examined assay performance for relative sensitivity, detection of active/inactive chemicals, and estrogen/antiestrogen activities. In this examination, we combined individual data sets in a specific, quantitative data mining exercise. Data sets for at least 29 chemicals from five laboratories were analyzed pair-wise by X-Y plots. The ER binding assay was a good predictor for the other two assay results when the antiestrogens were excluded (r(2) is 0.78 for the yeast assays and 0.85 for the E-SCREEN assays). Additionally, the examination strongly suggests that biologic information that is not apparent from any of the individual assays can be discovered by quantitative pair-wise comparisons among assays. Antiestrogens are identified as outliers in the ER binding/yeast assay, while complete antagonists are identified in the ER binding and E-SCREEN assays. Furthermore, the presence of outliers may be explained by different mechanisms that induce an endocrine response, different impurities in different batches of chemicals, different species sensitivity, or limitations of the assay techniques. Although these assays involve different levels of biologic complexity, the major conclusion is that they generally provided consistent information in quantitatively determining estrogenic activity for the five data sets examined. The results should provide guidance for expanded data mining examinations and the selection of appropriate assays to screen estrogenic endocrine disruptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10964792      PMCID: PMC1638296          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.00108723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  43 in total

1.  Evidence for the mechanism of action of the 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-mediated decrease of nuclear estrogen receptor levels in wild-type and mutant mouse Hepa 1c1c7 cells.

Authors:  T Zacharewski; M Harris; S Safe
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 5.858

2.  3,4,3',4'-Tetrachlorobiphenyl acts as an estrogen in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  K Nesaretnam; D Corcoran; R R Dils; P Darbre
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1996-08

3.  Membrane estrogen receptors identified by multiple antibody labeling and impeded-ligand binding.

Authors:  T C Pappas; B Gametchu; C S Watson
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Diethylstilbestrol and estradiol binding to serum albumin and pregnancy plasma of rat and human.

Authors:  D M Sheehan; M Young
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 5.  Chlorinated hydrocarbons: estrogens and antiestrogens.

Authors:  S Safe; V Krishnan
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.372

6.  Antiestrogens: mechanisms and actions in target cells.

Authors:  B S Katzenellenbogen; M M Montano; P Le Goff; D J Schodin; W L Kraus; B Bhardwaj; N Fujimoto
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 7.  Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop.

Authors:  R J Kavlock; G P Daston; C DeRosa; P Fenner-Crisp; L E Gray; S Kaattari; G Lucier; M Luster; M J Mac; C Maczka; R Miller; J Moore; R Rolland; G Scott; D M Sheehan; T Sinks; H A Tilson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  The structural pervasiveness of estrogenic activity.

Authors:  J A Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  The other estrogen receptor in the plasma membrane: implications for the actions of environmental estrogens.

Authors:  C S Watson; T C Pappas; B Gametchu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The E-SCREEN assay as a tool to identify estrogens: an update on estrogenic environmental pollutants.

Authors:  A M Soto; C Sonnenschein; K L Chung; M F Fernandez; N Olea; F O Serrano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  43 in total

1.  Hormone-activated estrogen receptors in annelid invertebrates: implications for evolution and endocrine disruption.

Authors:  June Keay; Joseph W Thornton
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 2.  Induction of oxidative stress by bisphenol A and its pleiotropic effects.

Authors:  Natalie R Gassman
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae BLYES expressing bacterial bioluminescence for rapid, sensitive detection of estrogenic compounds.

Authors:  John Sanseverino; Rakesh K Gupta; Alice C Layton; Stacey S Patterson; Steven A Ripp; Leslie Saidak; Michael L Simpson; T Wayne Schultz; Gary S Sayler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Association of birth outcomes with fetal exposure to parabens, triclosan and triclocarban in an immigrant population in Brooklyn, New York.

Authors:  Laura A Geer; Benny F G Pycke; Joshua Waxenbaum; David M Sherer; Ovadia Abulafia; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  Exposure to environmentally relevant doses of the xenoestrogen bisphenol-A alters development of the fetal mouse mammary gland.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Maricel V Maffini; Perinaaz R Wadia; Carlos Sonnenschein; Beverly S Rubin; Ana M Soto
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 4.736

6.  Serum estrogen receptor bioactivity and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Vanessa W Lim; Jun Li; Yinhan Gong; Aizhen Jin; Jian-Min Yuan; Eu Leong Yong; Woon-Puay Koh
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 7.  Bisphenol-A and the great divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Maricel V Maffini; Carlos Sonnenschein; Beverly S Rubin; Ana M Soto
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 19.871

8.  Serum factors and clinical characteristics associated with serum E-screen activity.

Authors:  Jue Wang; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Jocelyn D C Hemming; Curtis J Hedman; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Urinary, circulating, and tissue biomonitoring studies indicate widespread exposure to bisphenol A.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Ibrahim Chahoud; Jerrold J Heindel; Vasantha Padmanabhan; Francisco J R Paumgartten; Gilbert Schoenfelder
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Toxic masking and synergistic modulation of the estrogenic activity of chemical mixtures in a yeast estrogen screen (YES).

Authors:  Tobias Frische; Michael Faust; Wiebke Meyer; Thomas Backhaus
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.