Literature DB >> 11779842

Finding genes in the C2C12 osteogenic pathway by k-nearest-neighbor classification of expression data.

Joachim Theilhaber1, Timothy Connolly, Sergio Roman-Roman, Steven Bushnell, Amanda Jackson, Kathy Call, Teresa Garcia, Roland Baron.   

Abstract

A supervised classification scheme for analyzing microarray expression data, based on the k-nearest-neighbor method coupled to noise-reduction filters, has been used to find genes involved in the osteogenic pathway of the mouse C2C12 cell line studied here as a model for in vivo osteogenesis. The scheme uses as input a training set embodying expert biological knowledge, and provides internal estimates of its own misclassification errors, which furthermore enables systematic optimization of the classifier parameters. On the basis of the C2C12-generated expression data set with 34,130 expression profiles across 2 time courses, each comprised of 6 points, and a training set containing known members of the osteogenic, myoblastic, and adipocytic pathways, 176 new genes in addition to 28 originally in the training set are selected as relevant to osteogenesis. For this selection, the estimated sensitivity is 42% and the posterior false-positive rate (fraction of candidates that are spurious) is 12%. The corresponding sensitivity and false-positive rate for detection of myoblastic genes are 9% and 31%, respectively, and only 4% and approximately 100%, respectively, for adipocytic genes, in accordance with an experimental design that predominantly stimulated the osteogenic pathway. Validation of this selection is provided by examining expression of the genes in an independent biological assay involving mouse calvaria (skull bone) primary cell cultures, in which a large fraction of the 176 genes are seen to be strongly regulated, as well as by case-by-case analysis of the genes on the basis of expert domain knowledge. The methodology should be generalizable to any situation in which enough a priori biological knowledge exists to define a training set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11779842      PMCID: PMC155256          DOI: 10.1101/gr.182601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  41 in total

1.  Clustering gene expression patterns.

Authors:  A Ben-Dor; R Shamir; Z Yakhini
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  1999 Fall-Winter       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 2.  The genetic transformation of bone biology.

Authors:  G Karsenty
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data by using support vector machines.

Authors:  M P Brown; W N Grundy; D Lin; N Cristianini; C W Sugnet; T S Furey; M Ares; D Haussler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Bone morphogenetic proteins in human bone regeneration.

Authors:  E H Groeneveld; E H Burger
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.664

5.  Cloning of the chick BMP1/Tolloid cDNA and expression in skeletal tissues.

Authors:  S D Reynolds; D Zhang; J E Puzas; R J O'Keefe; R N Rosier; P R Reynolds
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  CACP, encoding a secreted proteoglycan, is mutated in camptodactyly-arthropathy-coxa vara-pericarditis syndrome.

Authors:  J Marcelino; J D Carpten; W M Suwairi; O M Gutierrez; S Schwartz; C Robbins; R Sood; I Makalowska; A Baxevanis; B Johnstone; R M Laxer; L Zemel; C A Kim; J K Herd; J Ihle; C Williams; M Johnson; V Raman; L G Alonso; D Brunoni; A Gerstein; N Papadopoulos; S A Bahabri; J M Trent; M L Warman
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Roles of bone morphogenetic protein type I receptors and Smad proteins in osteoblast and chondroblast differentiation.

Authors:  M Fujii; K Takeda; T Imamura; H Aoki; T K Sampath; S Enomoto; M Kawabata; M Kato; H Ichijo; K Miyazono
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling.

Authors:  A A Alizadeh; M B Eisen; R E Davis; C Ma; I S Lossos; A Rosenwald; J C Boldrick; H Sabet; T Tran; X Yu; J I Powell; L Yang; G E Marti; T Moore; J Hudson; L Lu; D B Lewis; R Tibshirani; G Sherlock; W C Chan; T C Greiner; D D Weisenburger; J O Armitage; R Warnke; R Levy; W Wilson; M R Grever; J C Byrd; D Botstein; P O Brown; L M Staudt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring.

Authors:  T R Golub; D K Slonim; P Tamayo; C Huard; M Gaasenbeek; J P Mesirov; H Coller; M L Loh; J R Downing; M A Caligiuri; C D Bloomfield; E S Lander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Effects of CTGF/Hcs24, a hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene product, on the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblastic cells in vitro.

Authors:  T Nishida; T Nakanishi; M Asano; T Shimo; M Takigawa
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.384

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Molecular genetic studies of gene identification for osteoporosis: a 2004 update.

Authors:  Yong-Jun Liu; Hui Shen; Peng Xiao; Dong-Hai Xiong; Li-Hua Li; Robert R Recker; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Screening gene signatures for clinical response subtypes of lung transplantation.

Authors:  Yu-Hang Zhang; Zhan Dong Li; Tao Zeng; Lei Chen; Tao Huang; Yu-Dong Cai
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Gene expression studies of osteoporosis: implications for microarray research.

Authors:  V Dvornyk; R R Recker; H-W Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Robust assignment of cancer subtypes from expression data using a uni-variate gene expression average as classifier.

Authors:  Martin Lauss; Attila Frigyesi; Tobias Ryden; Mattias Höglund
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Tools for interpreting large-scale protein profiling in microbiology.

Authors:  E L Hendrickson; R J Lamont; M Hackett
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Multilevel omic data integration in cancer cell lines: advanced annotation and emergent properties.

Authors:  Yuanhua Liu; Valentina Devescovi; Suning Chen; Christine Nardini
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2013-02-19

7.  Joint analysis of transcriptional and post- transcriptional brain tumor data: searching for emergent properties of cellular systems.

Authors:  Raffaele Fronza; Michele Tramonti; William R Atchley; Christine Nardini
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Gene expression profiling of mouse p53-deficient epidermal carcinoma defines molecular determinants of human cancer malignancy.

Authors:  Ramón García-Escudero; Ana B Martínez-Cruz; Mirentxu Santos; Corina Lorz; Carmen Segrelles; Guillermo Garaulet; Cristina Saiz-Ladera; Clotilde Costa; Agueda Buitrago-Pérez; Marta Dueñas; Jesús M Paramio
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 27.401

9.  Why is there a lack of consensus on molecular subgroups of glioblastoma? Understanding the nature of biological and statistical variability in glioblastoma expression data.

Authors:  Nicholas F Marko; John Quackenbush; Robert J Weil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Non-gaussian distributions affect identification of expression patterns, functional annotation, and prospective classification in human cancer genomes.

Authors:  Nicholas F Marko; Robert J Weil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.