Literature DB >> 11778832

Free-field unmasking response characteristics of frog auditory nerve fibers: comparison with the responses of midbrain auditory neurons.

W Y Lin1, A S Feng.   

Abstract

Previous studies in the inferior colliculus have shown that spatial separation of signal and noise sources improves signal detection. In this study, we investigated the free-field unmasking response properties of single fibers in the auditory nerve--these were compared to those of inferior colliculus neurons under the same experimental conditions to test the hypothesis that central processing confers advantages for signal detection in the presence of spatially separated noise. For each neuron, we determined the detection threshold for a probe at the unit's best azimuth under three conditions: (1) by itself, (2) when a masker at a constant level was also presented at the unit's best azimuth, and (3) when the masker was positioned at different azimuths. We found that, on average, maskers presented at a unit's best azimuth elevated the probe detection threshold by 4.22 dB in the auditory nerve and 10.97 dB in the inferior colliculus. Angular separation of probe and masker sources systematically reduced the masking effect. The maximum masking release was on average 2.90 dB for auditory nerve fibers and 9.40 dB for inferior colliculus units. These results support the working hypothesis, suggesting that central processing contributes to the stronger free-field unmasking in the inferior colliculus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11778832     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-001-0241-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  15 in total

1.  GABA is involved in spatial unmasking in the frog auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Wen-Yu Lin; Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs.

Authors:  Hamilton E Farris; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 3.  Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 4.  Sound source perception in anuran amphibians.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Spatial release from masking improves sound pattern discrimination along a biologically relevant pulse-rate continuum in gray treefrogs.

Authors:  Jessica L Ward; Nathan P Buerkle; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Sound level discrimination by gray treefrogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Alejandro Vélez; James D Forester
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  When signal meets noise: immunity of the frog ear to interference.

Authors:  Mario Penna; Juan Pablo Gormaz; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-04-30

10.  Inherent Directionality Determines Spatial Release from Masking at the Tympanum in a Vertebrate with Internally Coupled Ears.

Authors:  Michael S Caldwell; Norman Lee; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.