OBJECTIVE: To define the ability of UK paramedics to recognise ST segment elevation using a prehospital 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS: Analysis of the diagnostic ability of seven paramedics 12 months after a two day training course, using interpretation of a 12 lead ECG by two cardiologists as the criterion standard. Comparison of paramedic and A&E SHO diagnosis to determine accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of paramedic interpretation. RESULTS: Paramedics showed a median accuracy of 0.95 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.98), a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.53 to 1.0), a sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.99), a NPV of 0.77 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.92) and a PPV of 0.99 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.0). This was not significantly different from a group of experienced A&E SHOs. CONCLUSIONS: UK paramedics can recognise ST elevation using a 12 lead ECG. Radio transmission of an ECG may not be necessary to pre-alert the hospital.
OBJECTIVE: To define the ability of UK paramedics to recognise ST segment elevation using a prehospital 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS: Analysis of the diagnostic ability of seven paramedics 12 months after a two day training course, using interpretation of a 12 lead ECG by two cardiologists as the criterion standard. Comparison of paramedic and A&E SHO diagnosis to determine accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of paramedic interpretation. RESULTS: Paramedics showed a median accuracy of 0.95 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.98), a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.53 to 1.0), a sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.99), a NPV of 0.77 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.92) and a PPV of 0.99 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.0). This was not significantly different from a group of experienced A&E SHOs. CONCLUSIONS: UK paramedics can recognise ST elevation using a 12 lead ECG. Radio transmission of an ECG may not be necessary to pre-alert the hospital.
Authors: L Karagounis; S K Ipsen; M R Jessop; K M Gilmore; D A Valenti; J J Clawson; S Teichman; J L Anderson Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1990-10-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: T P Aufderheide; W C Haselow; G E Hendley; N A Robinson; L Armaganian; K M Hargarten; D W Olson; V T Valley; H A Stueven Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 1992-04 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: W D Weaver; M Cerqueira; A P Hallstrom; P E Litwin; J S Martin; P J Kudenchuk; M Eisenberg Journal: JAMA Date: 1993-09-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: W B Gibler; D J Kereiakes; E N Dean; L Martin; L Anderson; C W Abbottsmith; J Blanton; D Blanton; J A Morris; C D Gibler Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1991-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jakob L Forberg; Ardavan Khoshnood; Michael Green; Mattias Ohlsson; Jonas Björk; Stefan Jovinge; Lars Edenbrandt; Ulf Ekelund Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Sidney Aung; Eric Vittinghoff; Gregory Nah; Anthony Lin; Sean Joyce; N Clay Mann; Gregory M Marcus Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 4.379