Literature DB >> 11773149

Predictors of local-regional recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy without radiation.

Thomas A Buchholz1, Susan L Tucker, Lawrence Masullo, Henry M Kuerer, Jessica Erwin, Jessica Salas, Debbie Frye, Eric A Strom, Marsha D McNeese, George Perkins, Angela Katz, S Eva Singletary, Kelly K Hunt, Aman U Buzdar, Gabriel N Hortobagyi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define clinical and pathologic predictors of local-regional recurrence (LRR) for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy without radiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the outcome of the 150 breast cancer cases treated on prospective institutional trials with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy without postmastectomy radiation. Clinical stage at diagnosis was I in 1%, II in 43%, IIIA in 23%, IIIB in 25%, and IV in 7%. No patient had inflammatory breast cancer.
RESULTS: The median follow-up period of surviving patients was 4.1 years. The 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of LRR were both 27%. Pretreatment factors that positively correlated with LRR were increasing T stage (P <.0001) and increasing combined clinical stage (P <.0001). Pathologic and treatment factors that positively correlated with LRR were size of the residual primary tumor (P =.0048), increasing number of involved lymph nodes (P <.0001), and no use of tamoxifen (P =.0013). The LRR rate for the 18 patients with a pathologic complete response of both the primary tumor and lymph nodes (pCR) was 19% (95% confidence interval, 6% to 48%). In a forward stepwise Cox logistic regression analysis, clinical stage IIIB or greater (hazard ratio of 4.5, P <.001), pathologic involvement of four or more lymph nodes (hazard ratio of 2.7, P =.008), and no use of tamoxifen (hazard ratio of 3.9, P =.027) independently predicted for LRR.
CONCLUSION: Advanced disease at presentation and positive lymph nodes after chemotherapy predict for clinically significant rates of LRR. Achievement of pCR does not preclude the need for postmastectomy radiation if warranted by the pretreatment stage of the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11773149     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.1.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  26 in total

1.  Controversies concerning the use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Manfred Kaufmann; Thomas Karn; Eugen Ruckhäberle
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Invited commentary: The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on patients with locally advanced breast cancer in a nigerian semiurban teaching hospital: a single-center descriptive study.

Authors:  Ines Buccimazza
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Postmastectomy radiation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: review and interpretation of available data.

Authors:  Amar U Kishan; Susan A McCloskey
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 8.168

4.  Prognostic factors affecting locoregional recurrence in patients with stage IIIB noninflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  Kaptan Gülben; Uğur Berberoğlu; Aziz Cengiz; Hüseyin Altınyollar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Accuracy of ultrasonography and mammography in predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Keune; Donna B Jeffe; Mario Schootman; Abigail Hoffman; William E Gillanders; Rebecca L Aft
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Interdisciplinary GoR level III Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Breast Cancer: Short version - AWMF Registry No.: 032-045OL AWMF-Register-Nummer: 032-045OL - Kurzversion 3.0, Juli 2012.

Authors:  R Kreienberg; U-S Albert; M Follmann; I B Kopp; T Kühn; A Wöckel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Postmastectomy Radiation in Breast Cancer Patients With Pathologically Positive Lymph Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Usage Rates and Survival Trends.

Authors:  Nisha Ohri; Erin Moshier; Alice Ho; Sheryl Green; Ryan Rhome; Madhu Mazumdar; Simon Powell; Chiaojung Jillian Tsai
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Predictors of locoregional recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from combined analysis of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18 and B-27.

Authors:  Eleftherios P Mamounas; Stewart J Anderson; James J Dignam; Harry D Bear; Thomas B Julian; Charles E Geyer; Alphonse Taghian; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The role of biological markers as predictors of response to preoperative chemotherapy in large primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Veronique F Cocquyt; Vera R Schelfhout; Phillip N Blondeel; Herman T Depypere; Kristof K Daems; Rudolphe F Serreyn; Marleen M Praet; Simon J P Van Belle
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  State of the art of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: rationale, results and recent developments.

Authors:  Arnd Honig; Lorenz Rieger; Marc Sutterlin; Diethelm Wallwiener; Johannes Dietl; Erich-Franz Solomayer
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2005-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.