Literature DB >> 11770639

Broiler carcass contamination with Campylobacter from feces during defeathering.

M E Berrang1, R J Buhr, J A Cason, J A Dickens.   

Abstract

Three sets of experiments were conducted to explore the increase in recovery of Campylobacter from broiler carcasses after defeathering. In the first set of experiments, live broilers obtained from a commercial processor were transported to a pilot plant, and breast skin was sampled by a sponge wipe method before and after defeathering. One of 120 broiler breast skin samples was positive for Campylobacter before defeathering, and 95 of 120 were positive after defeathering. In the second set of experiments, Campylobacter-free flocks were identified, subjected to feed withdrawal, and transported to the pilot plant. Carcasses were intracloacally inoculated with Campylobacter (10(7) CFU) just prior to entering the scald tank. Breast skin sponge samples were negative for Campylobacter before carcasses entered the picker (0 of 120 samples). After defeathering, 69 of 120 samples were positive for Campylobacter, with an average of log10 2.7 CFU per sample (approximately 30 cm2). The third set of experiments was conducted using Campylobacter-positive broilers obtained at a commercial processing plant and transported live to the pilot plant. Just prior to scalding, the cloacae were plugged with tampons and sutured shut on half of the carcasses. Plugged carcasses were scalded, and breast skin samples taken before and after defeathering were compared with those collected from control broilers from the same flock. Prior to defeathering, 1 of 120 breast skin sponge samples were positive for the control carcasses, and 0 of 120 were positive for the plugged carcasses. After passing through the picker, 120 of 120 control carcasses had positive breast skin sponge samples, with an average of log10 4.2 CFU per sample (approximately 30 cm2). Only 13 of 120 plugged carcasses had detectable numbers of Campylobacter on the breast skin sponge, with an average of log10 2.5 CFU per sample. These data indicate that an increase in the recovery of Campylobacter after defeathering can be related to the escape of contaminated feces from the cloaca during defeathering.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11770639     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-64.12.2063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  19 in total

Review 1.  Campylobacter jejuni transducer like proteins: Chemotaxis and beyond.

Authors:  Kshipra Chandrashekhar; Issmat I Kassem; Gireesh Rajashekara
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2017-01-12

2.  Molecular tracking, through processing, of Campylobacter strains colonizing broiler flocks.

Authors:  Karen T Elvers; Victoria K Morris; Diane G Newell; Vivien M Allen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Quo vadis? - Monitoring Campylobacter in Germany.

Authors:  K Stingl; M-T Knüver; P Vogt; C Buhler; N-J Krüger; K Alt; B-A Tenhagen; M Hartung; A Schroeter; L Ellerbroek; B Appel; A Käsbohrer
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2012-03-17

4.  Prevalence and subtypes of ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter spp. in commercial poultry flocks before, during, and after treatment with fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  Tom J Humphrey; Frieda Jørgensen; Jennifer A Frost; Haddy Wadda; Gil Domingue; Nicola C Elviss; Deborah J Griggs; Laura J V Piddock
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Development of a strain-specific molecular method for quantitating individual campylobacter strains in mixed populations.

Authors:  Karen T Elvers; Christopher R Helps; Trudy M Wassenaar; Vivien M Allen; Diane G Newell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Rapid detection of Campylobacter coli, C. jejuni, and Salmonella enterica on poultry carcasses by using PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  Yang Hong; Mark E Berrang; Tongrui Liu; Charles L Hofacre; Susan Sanchez; Lihua Wang; John J Maurer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Evidence of cross-contamination by Campylobacter spp. of broiler carcasses using genetic characterization of isolates.

Authors:  Valérie Normand; Martine Boulianne; Sylvain Quessy
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.310

8.  Campylobacter spp. as a Foodborne Pathogen: A Review.

Authors:  Joana Silva; Daniela Leite; Mariana Fernandes; Cristina Mena; Paul Anthony Gibbs; Paula Teixeira
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Colonization factors of Campylobacter jejuni in the chicken gut.

Authors:  David Hermans; Kim Van Deun; An Martel; Filip Van Immerseel; Winy Messens; Marc Heyndrickx; Freddy Haesebrouck; Frank Pasmans
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.683

10.  Comparison of spa types, SCCmec types and antimicrobial resistance profiles of MRSA isolated from turkeys at farm, slaughter and from retail meat indicates transmission along the production chain.

Authors:  Birgit Vossenkuhl; Jörgen Brandt; Alexandra Fetsch; Annemarie Käsbohrer; Britta Kraushaar; Katja Alt; Bernd-Alois Tenhagen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.