Literature DB >> 1176509

Tissue ingrowth of Replamineform implants.

R T Chiroff, E W White, K N Weber, D M Roy.   

Abstract

The Replamineform process, a new technique for the fabrication of porous hard tissue implant materials which replicates the skeletal configuration of certain marine invertebrates, was used to manufacture 1 cm long by 0.5 cm diam cylinders. The inherent advantages of porous configurations obtained through this process are controlled, uniform pore size, controlled pore-microstructure ratio, and complete interconnection of pores. The specific materials studied were chrome-cobalt-molybdenum alloy, alphaA103, hydroxyapatite prepared by hydrothermal conversion, and the basic (aragonite) CaCO3 skeleton of the coral genus Porities. The implants were placed in the canellous bone of the distal femora and proximal tibiae of adult, mongrel dogs and analyzed at 8 weeks for tissue response and ingrowth. Uniformly, new bone was found to grow into the pores of these materials and become normally mineralized. These findings were determined by microradiography, scanning electron microscopy, electron microprobe analysis, and histology. No evidences of infection, rejection, or encapsulation were seen. In the case of those CaCO3 implants left in place for 1 year, there was almost complete resorption of the cylinders, with both bony trabeculae and unmineralized collagen (presumably osteoid) found at the sites of insertion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1176509     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820090407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  18 in total

1.  Effects of deproteinization and ashing on site-specific properties of cortical bone.

Authors:  J J Broz; S J Simske; W D Corley; A R Greenberg
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Physical and mechanical properties evaluation of Acropora palmata coralline species for bone substitution applications.

Authors:  K Alvarez; S Camero; M E Alarcón; A Rivas; G González
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  [The use of coral in bone surgery. Results following 4 years of utilization].

Authors:  B Loty; F X Roux; B George; J P Courpied; M Postel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  In vitro bone formation on coral granules.

Authors:  J M Sautier; J R Nefussi; H Boulekbache; N Forest
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1990-11

5.  Madreporic coral for cranial base reconstruction. 8 years experience.

Authors:  F X Roux; D Brasnu; M Menard; B Devaux; G Nohra; B Loty
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 6.  Bone graft substitutes for spine fusion: A brief review.

Authors:  Ashim Gupta; Nitin Kukkar; Kevin Sharif; Benjamin J Main; Christine E Albers; Saadiq F El-Amin Iii
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-07-18

7.  Preparation of an artificial bone containing collagen-hydroxylapatite (CHA) and its osteoinduction experiment.

Authors:  J D Xiao; T B Zhu; J Y Du; L Gao
Journal:  J Tongji Med Univ       Date:  1987

8.  Influence of 45S5 Bioactive Glass in A Standard Calcium Phosphate Collagen Bone Graft Substitute on the Posterolateral Fusion of Rabbit Spine.

Authors:  Andrew J Pugely; Emily B Petersen; Nicole DeVries-Watson; Douglas C Fredericks
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

9.  Osteochondral regeneration using a novel aragonite-hyaluronate bi-phasic scaffold in a goat model.

Authors:  E Kon; G Filardo; D Robinson; J A Eisman; A Levy; K Zaslav; J Shani; N Altschuler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes in a canine metaphyseal defect model: radiographic-biomechanical correlation.

Authors:  D J Sartoris; R E Holmes; A F Tencer; V Mooney; D Resnick
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.