Literature DB >> 11764341

A low stiffness composite biologically fixed prosthesis.

A H Glassman1, R D Crowninshield, R Schenck, P Herberts.   

Abstract

The current authors addressed the question whether stress-induced adaptive bone remodeling of the proximal femur is a necessary consequence after total hip reconstruction with extensively biologically-fixed femoral components. A novel total hip femoral component was designed to simultaneously achieve stable skeletal fixation, structural durability, and reduced femoral stress shielding. This implant allowed for proximal and distal canal filling, yet was significantly less rigid than all-metallic femoral stems crafted of either cobalt chromium or titanium alloy. A cohort of 366 patients (386 hips) treated at 21 institutions worldwide now have been followed up a mean of 2.4 years postoperatively (range, 3 months-6 years). Two hundred sixty-eight patients have 2 years minimum followup. To date, no femoral implants have failed to achieve bone ingrowth and none have required revision. The implants appear radiographically well-fixed with no progressive radiolucencies or osteolysis. Radiostereometric analysis studies on one subset of patients showed stable initial fixation and minimal stem micromotion. Dual energy xray absorptiometry analysis on another subset of patients revealed excellent periprosthetic bone mineral density retention. Compared with more rigid metal implants, this design shows reduced proximal femoral bone loss secondary to stress-mediated bone resorption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11764341     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200112000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

1.  Fixation and bone remodeling around a low stiffness stem in revision surgery.

Authors:  Johan Kärrholm; Reza Razaznejad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Changes in periprosthetic bone remodelling after redesigning an anatomic cementless stem.

Authors:  Juan J Panisello; Vicente Canales; Luis Herrero; Antonio Herrera; Jesús Mateo; María J Caballero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Applications of finite element simulation in orthopedic and trauma surgery.

Authors:  Antonio Herrera; Elena Ibarz; José Cegoñino; Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Sergio Puértolas; Enrique López; Jesús Mateo; Luis Gracia
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-04-18

4.  Chronic infection leading to failure of a composite femoral stem: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Bryan M Saltzman; Bryan Haughom; Julius K Oni; Brett R Levine
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-01-16

5.  Late remodeling around a proximally HA-coated tapered titanium femoral component.

Authors:  William N Capello; James A D'Antonio; Rudolph G Geesink; Judy R Feinberg; Marybeth Naughton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; John N Devine
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Survivorship of a low-stiffness extensively porous-coated femoral stem at 10 years.

Authors:  Mark A Hartzband; Andrew H Glassman; Victor M Goldberg; Louis R Jordan; Roy D Crowninshield; Kevin B Fricka; Louis C Jordan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The History of Biomechanics in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jan Van Houcke; Vikas Khanduja; Christophe Pattyn; Emmanuel Audenaert
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Comparison of Femoral Bone Mineral Density Changes around 3 Common Designs of Cementless Stems after Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Wen-Xing Wei; Yi Zeng; Jun Ma; Jing Yang; Bin Shen
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.