Literature DB >> 11764239

Testing the independence of two diagnostic tests.

Y Shen1, D Wu, M Zelen.   

Abstract

Consider two diagnostic procedures having binary outcomes. If one of the tests results in a positive finding, a more definitive diagnostic procedure will be administered to establish the presence or absence of a disease. The use of both tests will improve the overall screening sensitivity when the two tests are independent, compared with employing two tests that are positively correlated. We estimate the correlation coefficient of the two tests and derive statistical methods for testing the independence of the two diagnostic procedures conditional on disease status. The statistical tests are used to investigate the independence of mammography and clinical breast exams aimed at establishing the benefit of early detection of breast cancer. The data used in the analysis are obtained from periodic screening examinations of three randomized clinical trials of breast cancer screening. Analysis of each of these trials confirms the independence of the clinical breast and mammography examinations. Based on these three large clinical trials, we conclude that a clinical breast exam considerably increases the overall sensitivity relative to screening with mammography alone and should be routinely included in early breast cancer detection programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11764239     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.01009.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  9 in total

1.  Sojourn time and lead time projection in lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Dongfeng Wu; Diane Erwin; Gary L Rosner
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  MLE and Bayesian inference of age-dependent sensitivity and transition probability in periodic screening.

Authors:  Dongfeng Wu; Gary L Rosner; Lyle Broemeling
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Simulation Procedure in Periodic Cancer Screening Trials.

Authors:  Dongfeng Wu; Xiaoqin Wu; Ioana Banicescu; Ricolindo L Cariño
Journal:  J Mod Appl Stat Methods       Date:  2005-11

4.  Random Effects Models in a Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy of Two Diagnostic Tests Without a Gold Standard.

Authors:  Haitao Chu; Sining Chen; Thomas A Louis
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 5.  Evaluating the correlation between film mammography and MRI for screening women with increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Elkan F Halpern; Elizabeth A Rafferty; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.

Authors:  John Collins; Minh Huynh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography and clinical breast examination strategies: a comparison with current guidelines.

Authors:  Charlotte Hsieh Ahern; Yu Shen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis.

Authors:  John A Branda; Allen C Steere
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for integrating MRI into breast cancer screening for women at high risk.

Authors:  C H Ahern; Y-C T Shih; W Dong; G Parmigiani; Y Shen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.