Literature DB >> 11760140

A dissociation between attention and selection.

R W Remington1, C L Folk.   

Abstract

It is widely assumed that the allocatian of spatial attention results in the "selection" of attended objects or regions of space. That is, once a stimulus is attended, all its feature dimensions are processed irrespective of their relevance to behavioral goals. This assumption is based in part on experiments showing significant interference for attended stimuli when the response to an irrelevant dimension conflicts with the response to the relevant dimension (e.g., the Stroop effect). Here we show that such interference is not due to attending per se. In two spatial cuing experiments, we found that it was possible to restrict processing of attended stimuli to task-relevant dimensions. This new evidence supports two novel conclusions: (a) Selection involves more than the focusing of attention per se: and (b) task expectations play a key role in detertnining the depth of processing of the elementary feature dimensions of attended stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11760140     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  11 in total

1.  How to keep attention from straying: get engaged!

Authors:  Charles L Folk; Edward F Ester; Kristof Troemel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

2.  Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus-response bindings.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel; Jiska Memelink; Sharon Zmigrod; Lorenza S Colzato
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-25

3.  Ideomotor perception modulates visuospatial cueing.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Stephanie C Goodhew; Joshua B Moskowitz; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-11-06

4.  No identification of abrupt onsets that capture attention: evidence against a unified model of spatial attention.

Authors:  Joshua William Maxwell; Nicholas Gaspelin; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-04

Review 5.  The diachronic account of attentional selectivity.

Authors:  Alon Zivony; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations.

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Nicholas Gaspelin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Determinants of dwell time in visual search: similarity or perceptual difficulty?

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  From Capture to Inhibition: How does Irrelevant Information Influence Visual Search? Evidence from a Spatial Cuing Paradigm.

Authors:  Christine Mertes; Edmund Wascher; Daniel Schneider
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  When planning results in loss of control: intention-based reflexivity and working-memory.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Michael W Cole; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Category Processing and the human likeness dimension of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis: Eye-Tracking Data.

Authors:  Marcus Cheetham; Ivana Pavlovic; Nicola Jordan; Pascal Suter; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.