Literature DB >> 11758109

"What you see is not what you get". A plea to remove a 'normal' appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy.

M Chiarugi1, P Buccianti, L Decanini, R Balestri, L Lorenzetti, M Franceschi, E Cavina.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) is a well established alternative option to coeliotomy for suspected appendicitis. When a 'normal' appendix is found, appendectomy is often believe unnecessary. Little is known however about how normal a normal appearing appendix is. In this study we postulated that a normal appendix seen at DL, may show pathological indications at microscopy, and thus, to leave the appendix untouched may be unsafe.
METHODS: A retrospective review of data from 48 patients which, in a five year period (1995-1999), had virtually normal appendices removed as completion of DL for lower abdominal pain.
RESULTS: No procedure-related drawback and no subsequent complications were recorded. Symptoms subsided in all the patients. Mean hospital stay was 2.1 days. When receiving specimens, incidence of pathologic changes of the appendix were observed in 58 percent of the cases (n = 28). The negative predictive value of DL was 41 percent.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to the consistently false negative rate of DL, and the low morbidity rate for laparoscopic appendectomy, we support incidental appendectomy in patients with lower abdominal pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11758109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Belg        ISSN: 0001-5458            Impact factor:   1.090


  13 in total

1.  Current trends in the management of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  S Ng; F J Fleming; J Drumm; D Waldron; P A Grace
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  [Laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Should an appendix that appears normal be removed?].

Authors:  B Garlipp; G Arlt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  James R Korndorffer; Erika Fellinger; William Reed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Appendectomy in Germany-an analysis of a nationwide survey 2011/2012.

Authors:  Dirk Rolf Bulian; Jürgen Knuth; Axel Sauerwald; Michael Alfred Ströhlein; Rolf Lefering; Jörg Ansorg; Markus Maria Heiss
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Neurogenic appendicopathy: an underestimated disease-systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Sarah Peisl; Oliver Burckhardt; Bernhard Egger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Laparoscopic assisted two port open appendicectomy.

Authors:  Vishwanath Golash
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2008-07

7.  A prospective audit of 300 consecutive young women with an acute presentation of right iliac fossa pain.

Authors:  Adam T M Rennie; Matthew G Tytherleigh; Katerina Theodoroupolou; Ridzuan Farouk
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Appendicopathy--a clinical and diagnostic dilemma.

Authors:  Lars Ivo Partecke; Andrea Thiele; Franziska Schmidt-Wankel; Wolfram Kessler; Michael Wodny; Frank Dombrowski; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Wolfram von Bernstorff
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The Unacceptable Morbidity of Negative Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.

Authors:  Matthew G R Allaway; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

Authors:  Abdul Razak Shaikh; Ahmed Khan Sangrasi; Gulshan Ara Shaikh
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.