Literature DB >> 11757012

A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.

Richard H Haug1, Gilman P Peterson, Michele Goltz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of various rigid internal fixation techniques for mandibular condylar process fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synthetic mandible replicas (Synbone, Landquart, Switzerland) were used to evaluate a control, and four monocortical mandibular condyle plating techniques. Each group was subjected to linear loading in lateral to medial, medial to lateral and posterior to anterior directions by an Instron 1331 (Instron, Canton, MA) servohydraulic mechanical testing unit. Yield load, yield displacement, and stiffness were measured. In addition, each group was subjected to torsional loading using an Instron 8521 (Instron). Yield torque, yield rotation, and stiffness were measured. Five samples were tested for each group and method of loading (n = 100). Means and standard deviations were derived and compared for statistical significance using a 1-way analysis variance (P <.05). Third-order polynomial best-fit curves were also created for each group to further evaluate and compare the mechanical behavior.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were noted between fixation groups for the different mechanical measures evaluated under the different conditions of linear loading. Statistically significant differences were noted between groups for yield rotation during torsional loading. Although different in magnitude, similar patterns of mechanical behavior were observed in the third-order polynomial best-fit curves for lateral to medial loading, medial to lateral loading and torsional loading. For posterior to anterior loading, different patterns of mechanical behavior were noted between the experimental groups, but similar behavior was noted between the control and mini dynamic compression plate
CONCLUSIONS: While differences were noted between each of the fixation systems in their abilities to resist loads under the conditions tested, the mini dynamic compression plate provided the most favorable mechanical behavior. Based on the presumed clinical parameters, we can suggest that none of the systems evaluated were ideal for the treatment of mandibular condyle fractures, but that the mini dynamic compression plate is the closest to an effective means for reconstruction. Copyright 2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:73-80, 2002

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11757012     DOI: 10.1053/joms.2002.29078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  14 in total

1.  Finite element analysis of patient-specific condyle fracture plates: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Peter Aquilina; William C H Parr; Uphar Chamoli; Stephen Wroe
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-14

2.  Development and Clinical Evaluation of MatrixMANDIBLE Subcondylar Plates System (Synthes).

Authors:  Roberto Cortelazzi; Mario Altacera; Monica Turco; Viviana Antonicelli; Michele De Benedittis
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-10-31

3.  Relationship between mandibular condyle and angle fractures and the presence of mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Deuk-Hyun Mah; Su-Gwan Kim; Seong-Yong Moon; Ji-Su Oh; Jae-Seek You
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-02-24

4.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Three 1.5-mm Plate and Screw Configurations and a Single 2.0-mm Plate for Internal Fixation of a Mandibular Condylar Fracture.

Authors:  Peter Aquilina; William C H Parr; Uphar Chamoli; Stephen Wroe; Philip Clausen
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-04-18

5.  [Transoral osteosynthesis of condylar neck fractures using a three-dimensional plate].

Authors:  G Lauer; W Pradel; M Schneider; U Eckelt
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-09

6.  The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Mandible Fractures- Level 2 Tutorial.

Authors:  Carl-Peter Cornelius; Laurent Audigé; Christoph Kunz; Randal Rudderman; Carlos H Buitrago-Téllez; John Frodel; Joachim Prein
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-12

7.  Assessment of Bite Force in Patients Treated with 2.0-mm Traditional Miniplates versus 2.0-mm Locking Plates for Mandibular Fracture.

Authors:  Sanjay Rastogi; Mahendra Parvath Reddy; Azeez Gaurav Swarup; Divya Swarup; Rupshikha Choudhury
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-09-21

8.  Bite Force Evaluation of Conventional Plating System Versus Locking Plating System for Mandibular Fracture.

Authors:  Kolli Yada Giri; Puneet Sahu; Sanjay Rastogi; Ramakant Dandriyal; Sunil Mall; Aishwarya Pratap Singh; Niranjana Prasad Indra B; Himanshu Pratap Singh
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-03-10

9.  Setbacks of bio-resorbable plates and screws in the management of condylar fractures: our experience.

Authors:  N Chaithanyaa; K K Rai; K V Arun Kumar; Kapil Lahoti
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-26

10.  Resistance of four fixation techniques used to treat subcondylar fractures.

Authors:  Lucas Cavalieri-Pereira; Guilherme Spagnol; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Márcio de Moraes; Alexandre Elias Trivellato
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.