Literature DB >> 11756368

A randomized comparison of medical abortion and surgical vacuum aspiration at 10-13 weeks gestation.

Premila W Ashok1, Avril Kidd, Gillian M M Flett, Ann Fitzmaurice, Wendy Graham, Allan Templeton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 1991, mifepristone in combination with a prostaglandin analogue has been licensed for termination of pregnancy in the UK at up to 9 weeks amenorrhoea, and since 1995, beyond 13 weeks. Surgical methods are used almost exclusively at 10-13 weeks amenorrhoea.
METHODS: A patient-centred, partially randomized, controlled trial was carried out. Those who expressed a strong preference for either medical (n = 15) or surgical (n = 62) abortion were allocated to that method. The remainder agreed to be randomized. The medical method (n = 188) was mifepristone 200 mg followed by misoprostol up to 3 doses, and surgery (n = 180) was by vacuum aspiration under general anaesthesia. Outcome measures included efficacy rates, medical complications within 8 weeks of the procedure, patient preferences and acceptability.
RESULTS: Among women who underwent medical abortion, 5.4% required a second procedure compared with 2.1% who had surgery, although this difference was not statistically significant. Side effects experienced were higher in women who underwent medical abortion compared with those who underwent surgery. There were no significant differences in the rates of major complications up to 8 weeks. Prior to termination, 80% of women had a preference for a method, with 72% preferring medical and 28% preferring surgical abortion. Following abortion, 70% of those who underwent medical termination and 79% who underwent surgery would opt for the same method in the future.
CONCLUSION: Medical abortion is safe and effective at 10-13 weeks gestation and should be considered an option for those women who wish to avoid surgery and anaesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11756368     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.1.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  9 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes for patients with the same disease treated inside and outside of randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natasha Fernandes; Dianne Bryant; Lauren Griffith; Mohamed El-Rabbany; Nisha M Fernandes; Crystal Kean; Jacquelyn Marsh; Siddhi Mathur; Rebecca Moyer; Clare J Reade; John J Riva; Lyndsay Somerville; Neera Bhatnagar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Termination of Pregnancy in First Trimester - Medical Option.

Authors:  Sushil Kumar; Z K Antony; A Kapur; M Togra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 3.  Options for early therapeutic abortion: a comparative review.

Authors:  Marc Bygdeman; Kristina G Danielsson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Quality of life and acceptability of medical versus surgical management of early pregnancy failure.

Authors:  B Harwood; T Nansel
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Non interventional drug studies in oncology: Why we need them?

Authors:  Divya Mishra; Jesal Vora
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2010-10

6.  Medical abortion in the late first trimester: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nathalie Kapp; Elisabeth Eckersberger; Antonella Lavelanet; Maria Isabel Rodriguez
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 7.  Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.

Authors:  Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Dianne Bryant; Lyndsay Somerville; Trevor Birminghem; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16

Review 8.  Experiences of abortion: a narrative review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Mabel L S Lie; Stephen C Robson; Carl R May
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Reproductive outcomes following induced abortion: a national register-based cohort study in Scotland.

Authors:  Siladitya Bhattacharya; Alison Lowit; Sohinee Bhattacharya; Edwin Amalraj Raja; Amanda Jane Lee; Tahir Mahmood; Allan Templeton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.