Literature DB >> 11756353

Is your IVF programme good?

Michael M Alper1, Peter R Brinsden, Robert Fischer, Matts Wikland.   

Abstract

Few standards exist today to assess the quality of an IVF centre. Although much focus is placed upon pregnancy rates, emphasis on this outcome alone is inadequate. The purpose of this report is to examine those factors that should be considered in assessing the overall quality of an IVF centre. Current methods to assess quality are reviewed. Many governing bodies throughout the world currently focus solely on pregnancy rates, which can be misguided if factors such as multiple pregnancies, ovarian hyperstimulation, patient satisfaction, and the proper evaluation of laboratory and clinical protocols are not taken into account. Measurements of quality and methods to improve it are critical in all business models, including IVF. We propose an international standard such as the ISO 9001 for IVF centres to properly evaluate and improve the delivery of their care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11756353     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.1.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  8 in total

Review 1.  The German IVF Register as an Instrument to Document Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  S Kadi; U Wiesing
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  A modified ultra-long pituitary downregulation protocol improved endometrial receptivity and clinical outcome for infertile patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Authors:  Fei Gong; Xihong Li; Shunji Zhang; Hainan Ma; Sufen Cai; Juan Li; G E Lin; Guangxiu Lu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Deep learning early warning system for embryo culture conditions and embryologist performance in the ART laboratory.

Authors:  Charles L Bormann; Carol Lynn Curchoe; Prudhvi Thirumalaraju; Manoj K Kanakasabapathy; Raghav Gupta; Rohan Pooniwala; Hemanth Kandula; Irene Souter; Irene Dimitriadis; Hadi Shafiee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 4.  Low-cost in vitro fertilization: current insights.

Authors:  Pek Joo Teoh; Abha Maheshwari
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-21

5.  Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Low Prognosis Patients According to the POSEIDON Criteria: An Analysis of 26,697 Cycles of in vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Xiaofeng Li; Xiaoyi Yang; Sufen Cai; Guangxiu Lu; Ge Lin; Peter Humaidan; Fei Gong
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 6.  Biomedical infertility care in sub-Saharan Africa: a social science-- review of current practices, experiences and view points.

Authors:  T Gerrits; M Shaw
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2010

7.  The ambiguity of patient-centred practices: the case of a Dutch fertility clinic.

Authors:  Trudie Gerrits
Journal:  Anthropol Med       Date:  2014-05-14

8.  Infertile men's needs and assessment of fertility care.

Authors:  Randi Sylvest; Jeanette Krogh Fürbringer; Lone Schmidt; Anja Pinborg
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.384

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.