Literature DB >> 11756110

Using a sterile disposable protective surgical drape for reduction of radiation exposure to interventionalists.

Jerry N King1, Anna M Champlin, Charles A Kelsey, David A Tripp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to show the effectiveness of a new radiation protection method designed to decrease the amount of scatter radiation received by practitioners performing procedures under fluoroscopic guidance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sterile, disposable, lead-free surgical drape containing radiation protection material composed primarily of bismuth was evaluated for effectiveness in reducing radiation doses to health care personnel. Measurements of phantom scatter, patient scatter, skin entrance, and the effects of collimation, together with comparative monthly thermoluminescent dosimeter recordings, were taken to determine the effectiveness of X-ray beam attenuation using the bismuth drapes.
RESULTS: Scatter radiation to physicians, as measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters placed on each eye, the thyroid, and the wrist, was reduced by 12-fold for the eyes, 25-fold for the thyroid, and 29-fold for the hands when the radiation-attenuating surgical drape was used when compared with control studies performed with a standard nonattenuating surgical drape alone. Monthly thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements decreased fourfold in one physician. Using the protective drape reduced exposure to the assistant in each case to negligible levels. Skin entrance dose was not increased unless the protective drape was placed directly in the X-ray beam. An X-ray attenuation factor equivalent to 0.1 mm of lead with 8 x 8 cm collimation reduced the scatter rates from five- to ninefold despite a 30-40% increase in entrance exposure rate as the lead equivalence increased.
CONCLUSION: Depending on the procedure, the height of the practitioner, and the positioning of the radiation-attenuating surgical drape, use of this drape can substantially reduce the radiation dose to personnel with minimal or no additional radiation exposure to the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11756110     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.178.1.1780153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  15 in total

1.  Current attitudes of Turkish anesthesiologists to radiation exposure.

Authors:  Adnan Tüfek; Orhan Tokgöz; Ilker Öngüç Aycan; Feyzi Çelik; Abdurrahman Gümüş
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Significantly reduced radiation exposure to operators during kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty procedures: methods and techniques.

Authors:  A O Ortiz; V Natarajan; D R Gregorius; S Pollack
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  The Efficacy of Shielding Systems for Reducing Operator Exposure during Neurointerventional Procedures: A Real-World Prospective Study.

Authors:  T R Miller; J Zhuo; G Jindal; R Shivashankar; N Beaty; D Gandhi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Prevention of Contrast and Radiation Injury During Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Arash Ehteshami Afshar; Puja B Parikh
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-22

5.  Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Eliseo Vañó; Gabriel Bartal; Stephen Balter; Robert Dixon; Renato Padovani; Beth Schueler; John F Cardella; Thierry de Baère
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  A novel removable shield attached to C-arm units against scattered X-rays from a patient's side.

Authors:  Hiroshige Mori; Kichiro Koshida; Osamu Ishigamori; Kosuke Matsubara
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Heavy metal pad shielding during fluoroscopic interventions.

Authors:  Sergio Dromi; Bradford J Wood; Jay Oberoi; Ziv Neeman
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Minimizing scattered radiation dose in cardiac catheterization laboratory during interventional procedures using lead free drape - MILD study.

Authors:  Keshavamurthy Ganapathy Bhat; Vivek Singh Guleria; Manish Singla; Vijay Bohra; Ratheesh Kumar J; Prashant Bharadwaj; Rajat Datta; Pradeep Kumar Hasija
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 9.  Practice of ALARA in the pediatric interventional suite.

Authors:  Bairbre Connolly; John Racadio; Richard Towbin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09

10.  Are the urology operating room personnel aware about the ionizing radiation?

Authors:  Adem Tok; Alparslan Akbas; Nimet Aytan; Tamer Aliskan; Izzet Cicekbilek; Mehmet Kaba; Abdulkadir Tepeler
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.