Literature DB >> 11753608

Genotypically nonidentical related donors for transplantation of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: comparison with unrelated donor transplantation and autologous stem cell transplantation.

T de Witte1, F Pikkemaat, J Hermans, A van Biezen, S Mackinnan, J Cornelissen, A Gratwohl, M Delforge, A Iriondo, M Kuentz, J Harousseau, A Fauser, H Wandt, V Runde, D Niederwieser, J Apperley.   

Abstract

Transplantation with histocompatible identical siblings is a curative treatment for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Alternative treatments, such as transplantation with other family donors, are an option for patients without HLA-identical siblings. This study evaluated transplantation with genotypically nonidentical family donors and compared the results to those obtained with unrelated donors and autologous stem cell transplantation. Overall 3-year survival was 35% for the 79 patients transplanted using genotypically nonidentical donors, DFS was 31%, relapse risk 16%, and the treatment-related mortality (TRM) 62%. Patients transplanted using phenotypically identical family donors had a significantly superior survival and a lower TRM than patients transplanted with mismatched family donors. Age had no influence on the outcome of transplantation. The DFS of patients transplanted in early stage of the disease was 42% compared to 28% in patients transplanted with more advanced disease (P = 0.03). The results of transplantation with mismatched family donors were comparable to those obtained with unrelated donor transplantation. This suggests that nonidentical family donors may be considered if a fully matched unrelated donor is not available. The TRM of patients transplanted with nonidentical family donors is significantly higher than the TRM of patients transplanted with autologous stem cells. The disease-free survival of ASCT is not inferior to allogeneic transplantation using nonidentical family donors, and the intensity of the treatment is much lower. The choice of ASCT or alternative donor transplantation must be influenced by the age of the patient and the risk of relapse. For patients under the age of 20 years the treatment of choice may indeed be an alternative donor transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11753608     DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  7 in total

1.  Unrelated cord blood transplantation after myeloablative conditioning for adult patients with refractory anemia.

Authors:  Jun Ooi; Tohru Iseki; Satoshi Takahashi; Akira Tomonari; Kashiya Takasugi; Michihiro Uchiyama; Takaaki Konuma; Kenji Fukuno; Yasushi Soda; Nobuhiro Ohno; Fumitaka Nagamura; Kaoru Uchimaru; Arinobu Tojo; Shigetaka Asano
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Myeloablative conditioning regimens with combined of haploidentical and cord blood transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome patients.

Authors:  P Ke; X-B Bao; X-H Hu; J Zhuang; X-J Wu; Y-J Liu; X-F He; D-P Wu; S-L Xue; X Ma
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  Review of stem-cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes in older patients in the context of the Decision Memo for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome emanating from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Authors:  Sergio A Giralt; Mary Horowitz; Daniel Weisdorf; Corey Cutler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Haploidentical transplant for myelodysplastic syndrome: registry-based comparison with identical sibling transplant.

Authors:  Y Wang; H-X Wang; Y-R Lai; Z-M Sun; D-P Wu; M Jiang; D-H Liu; K-L Xu; Q-F Liu; L Liu; J-B Wang; F Gao; J Ou-Yang; S-J Gao; L-P Xu; X-J Huang
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Analysis of risk factors influencing outcome in children with myelodysplastic syndrome after unrelated cord blood transplantation.

Authors:  A B M Madureira; M Eapen; F Locatelli; P Teira; M-J Zhang; S M Davies; A Picardi; A Woolfrey; K-W Chan; G Socié; A Vora; Y Bertrand; C M Sales-Bonfim; E Gluckman; C Niemeyer; V Rocha
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  [Advances in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes].

Authors:  Y Wang; X J Huang
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017-04-14

7.  Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet.

Authors:  Luca Malcovati; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; David Bowen; Lionel Adès; Jaroslav Cermak; Consuelo Del Cañizo; Matteo G Della Porta; Pierre Fenaux; Norbert Gattermann; Ulrich Germing; Joop H Jansen; Moshe Mittelman; Ghulam Mufti; Uwe Platzbecker; Guillermo F Sanz; Dominik Selleslag; Mette Skov-Holm; Reinhard Stauder; Argiris Symeonidis; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Theo de Witte; Mario Cazzola
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 22.113

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.