Literature DB >> 11753573

The relationship between pedometer-determined ambulatory activity and body composition variables.

C Tudor-Locke1, B E Ainsworth, M C Whitt, R W Thompson, C L Addy, D A Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between pedometer-determined ambulatory activity (steps/day) and body composition variables body mass index (BMI) and percentage body fat).
DESIGN: : Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional objective activity monitoring study for up to 21 consecutive days.
SUBJECTS: A total of 109 apparently healthy adults (eight African American males, 23 African-American females, 33 Caucasian males, 45 Caucasian females), age 44.9+/-15.8 y, BMI=26.9+/-5.1 kg/m2. MEASUREMENTS: Pedometer-assessed ambulatory activity (steps/day), height and weight, and percentage body fat by bioelectrical impedance.
RESULTS: Analyzed as both a continuous and a categorical variable (determined using 25th and 75th percentiles for distribution for steps/day), ambulatory activity was consistently related to body composition variables. Steps/day was inversely correlated with BMI and percentage body fat (r=-0.30, and r=-0.27, respectively, both P<0.01). The consistency of the relationship was also evident when examined using accepted BMI cut-off points for normal-weight, overweight, and obese categories.
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals in this small sample with values greater than approximately 9000 steps/day are more frequently classified as normal weight for height. Individuals with values less than approximately 5000 steps/day are more frequently classified as obese. These findings require further corroborative investigation but provide preliminary cutoff points for identifying individuals at risk who may benefit from appropriate physical activity intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11753573     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord


  36 in total

1.  Effect of daily walking steps on ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus in elderly Japanese women.

Authors:  J Kitagawa; F Omasu; Y Nakahara
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; David R Bassett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: construct validity.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Joel E Williams; Jared P Reis; Delores Pluto
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Steps and sitting in a working population.

Authors:  Ruth Miller; Wendy Brown
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2004

5.  Comparison of two waist-mounted and two ankle-mounted electronic pedometers.

Authors:  Murat Karabulut; Scott E Crouter; David R Bassett
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Maintaining femoral bone density in adults: how many steps per day are enough?

Authors:  Katherine A Boyer; B Jenny Kiratli; Thomas P Andriacchi; Gary S Beaupre
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Impact of Daily Physical Activity as Measured by Commonly Available Wearables on Mealtime Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Basak Ozaslan; Stephen D Patek; Marc D Breton
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Walking attenuates the relationships of high-meat, low-fruit dietary intake to total and regional adiposity in men and women.

Authors:  Paul T Williams
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Association between walking distance and percentiles of body mass index in older and younger men.

Authors:  P T Williams
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Influence of socio-economic status on habitual physical activity and sedentary behavior in 8- to 11-year old children.

Authors:  Clemens Drenowatz; Joey C Eisenmann; Karin A Pfeiffer; Greg Welk; Kate Heelan; Douglas Gentile; David Walsh
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.