Literature DB >> 11753259

AcrySof acrylic intraocular lens implantation in children: clinical indications of biocompatibility.

M E Wilson1, L Elliott, B Johnson, M M Peterseim, S Rah, L Werner, S K Pandey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical biocompatibility of AcrySof (Alcon, Ft Worth, Tex) acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) in the highly reactive eyes of infants and children.
METHODS: A database of 230 pediatric IOL implantations was queried to allow retrospective review of all eyes implanted with an AcrySof IOL. Eyes implanted with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) IOLs were also reviewed and were used as a historical comparison group. Follow-up examinations were conducted by the surgeon on postoperative day 1, day 7, week 4, and week 8 and every 3 months during the first year and every 6 months thereafter. The presence of synechiae, lens deposits, and posterior capsule opacification were noted in the record at each visit. Examination notes were photocopied, and data were extracted from each visit note and entered into a computerized database.
RESULTS: One hundred and ten eyes had an AcrySof IOL at an average age of 60.4 months and had an average postoperative follow-up of 64.6 weeks. In comparison, 120 eyes had PMMA IOLs inserted at an average age of 71.9 months with an average postoperative follow-up of 136.9 weeks. IOL cell deposits were seen at the slit lamp in 7 of 110 (6.4%) AcrySof lenses as compared with 26 of 120 (21.75%) PMMA lenses (P =.002). Posterior synechiae were seen in 5 of 110 (4.5%) AcrySof lenses as compared with 23 of 120 (19.2%) PMMA lenses (P =.001). Twenty-two AcrySof-implanted eyes had an intact posterior capsule. Twenty-eight PMMA-implanted eyes had an intact posterior capsule. The YAG laser capsulotomy rate was similar in the 2 groups at 45.4% for AcrySof and 50% for PMMA (P =.973). The average time from surgery to YAG posterior capsulotomy was 18.6 months with an AcrySof lens and 18.3 months with a PMMA lens (P =.951; t test). A total of 60 patients (68%) implanted with AcrySof IOLs were able to cooperate for Snellen visual acuities. Of their 67 eyes, 48 (72%) had a 20/40 or better visual acuity at the last follow-up examination, and 63 eyes (94%) had a 20/100 or better visual acuity. Thirty-five eyes (52%) required amblyopia therapy, and patching continues as needed.
CONCLUSIONS: The AcrySof IOL is representative of a new group of foldable IOLs made from flexible hydrophobic acrylic material. The AcrySof IOL appears clinically to be biocompatible when placed in the eyes of children despite the increased tissue reactivity known to occur in young patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11753259     DOI: 10.1067/mpa.2001.119786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  10 in total

1.  A survey of the surgical treatment of congenital and developmental cataracts in Japan.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Nagamoto; Tetsuro Oshika; Takashi Fujikado; Tatsuro Ishibashi; Miho Sato; Mineo Kondo; Daijiro Kurosaka; Noriyuki Azuma
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Commentary review: challenges of intraocular lens implantation for congenital cataract infants.

Authors:  Qi-Hui Zhao; Yun-E Zhao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Results and complications of hydrophobic acrylic vs PMMA posterior chamber lenses in children under 17 years of age.

Authors:  Michael Küchle; Berthold Lausen; Gabriele-Charlotte Gusek-Schneider
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Hydrophobic acrylic versus polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lens implantation following cataract surgery in the first year of life.

Authors:  Jagat Ram; Vaibhav K Jain; Aniruddha Agarwal; Jaidrath Kumar
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Primary IOL implantation in children: a risk analysis of foldable acrylic v PMMA lenses.

Authors:  N A Rowe; S Biswas; I C Lloyd
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  Updates on managements of pediatric cataract.

Authors:  Mehrdad Mohammadpour; Amirreza Shaabani; Alireza Sahraian; Bita Momenaei; Fereshteh Tayebi; Reza Bayat; Reza Mirshahi
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-22

7.  Posterior Capsule Opacification after Cataract Surgery in Children Over Five Years of Age with Square-edge Hydrophobic versus Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Camila Ribeiro Koch; Marcony R Santhiago; Priscilla A Jorge; Paulo Sena; Newton Kara-Júnior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Hydrophilic Acrylic versus PMMA Intraocular Lens Implantation in Pediatric Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Mahmoud-Reza Panahi-Bazaz; Mitra Zamani; Bijan Abazar
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2009-10

9.  Management of cataracts and ectopia lentis in children: Practice patterns of pediatric ophthalmologists in India.

Authors:  Vasudha Kemmanu; Pragnya Rathod; Harsha L Rao; Sumitha Muthu; Chaitra Jayadev
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Pediatric cataract surgery with hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens implantation in Nepalese children.

Authors:  Srijana Adhikari; Ujjowala D Shrestha
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.