Literature DB >> 24947548

Hydrophobic acrylic versus polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lens implantation following cataract surgery in the first year of life.

Jagat Ram1, Vaibhav K Jain, Aniruddha Agarwal, Jaidrath Kumar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate complication rates following implantation of hydrophobic acrylic versus polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) intraocular lens (IOL) with cataract surgery in infants.
METHODS: Records of children undergoing cataract surgery with IOL implantation in first year of life were retrospectively reviewed. Infants were divided into two groups--hydrophobic acrylic IOLs were implanted in group A, and PMMA IOLs in group B. Outcome measures included incidence of complications, additional surgical procedures, and refractive error changes.
RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen eyes of 113 children (75 males) with mean age of 6.49 ± 3.56 months were included. Group A included 62 eyes, and group B included 51 eyes. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of age and axial length. There was no significant difference between the groups for incidence of posterior capsular opacification (PCO), pupillary membranes, glaucoma, fibrin on IOL surface or IOL malposition (p = 0.09). Development of PCO was delayed in group A (p = 0.049). Thirteen eyes of group A and 18 eyes of group B required additional surgical intervention (p = 0.20) in the follow-up visits.
CONCLUSION: Comparable complications may be expected in infants with PMMA and hydrophobic acrylic lenses. Children implanted with PMMA IOLs may require earlier surgical re-intervention for PCO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24947548     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2689-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  28 in total

1.  Accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes in regression analysis.

Authors:  R J Glynn; B Rosner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-03

Review 2.  Paediatric IOL implantation and postoperative refractive state: what role do study methodology and surgical technique play?

Authors:  Ken K Nischal; Lola Solebo; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Complications in the first year following cataract surgery with and without IOL in infants and older children.

Authors:  David A Plager; Sherry Yang; Daniel Neely; Derek Sprunger; Naval Sondhi
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Changes in posterior capsule opacification after poly(methyl methacrylate), silicone, and acrylic intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  K Hayashi; H Hayashi; F Nakao; F Hayashi
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in paediatric cataract surgery.

Authors:  C Tromans; P M Haigh; S Biswas; I C Lloyd
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  Updates on the surgical management of paediatric cataract with primary intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Dorothy S P Fan; Wilson W K Yip; Christopher B O Yu; Srinivas K Rao; Dennis S C Lam
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.473

7.  Biological compatibility of polymethyl methacrylate, hydrophilic acrylic and hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Walid Barbour; Shizuya Saika; Takeshi Miyamoto; Yoshitaka Ohnishi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 2.892

8.  Primary intraocular lens implantation in the first two years of life: safety profile and visual results.

Authors:  Jagat Ram; Gagandeep Singh Brar; Sushmita Kaushik; Jaspreet Sukhija; Supratik Bandyopadhyay; Amod Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Intraocular lens implantation during infancy: perceptions of parents and the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus members.

Authors:  Scott R Lambert; Michael Lynn; Carolyn Drews-Botsch; Lindreth DuBois; M Edward Wilson; David A Plager; David T Wheeler; Stephen P Christiansen; Earl R Crouch; Edward G Buckley; David Stager; Sean P Donahue
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.220

10.  Results and complications of hydrophobic acrylic vs PMMA posterior chamber lenses in children under 17 years of age.

Authors:  Michael Küchle; Berthold Lausen; Gabriele-Charlotte Gusek-Schneider
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Surgical interventions for bilateral congenital cataract in children aged two years and under.

Authors:  Ritvij Singh; Lucy Barker; Sean I Chen; Anupa Shah; Vernon Long; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-15

Review 2.  Pediatric cataract: challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Anagha Medsinge; Ken K Nischal
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-07

3.  Posterior Capsule Opacification after Cataract Surgery in Children Over Five Years of Age with Square-edge Hydrophobic versus Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Camila Ribeiro Koch; Marcony R Santhiago; Priscilla A Jorge; Paulo Sena; Newton Kara-Júnior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.365

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.