Literature DB >> 11753252

Stereoacuity and foveal fusion in adults with long-standing surgical monovision.

S L Fawcett1, W K Herman, C D Alfieri, K A Castleberry, M M Parks, E E Birch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although binocular vision deficits occur in children who have a constant esotropia onset following significant maturation of stereopsis, it is uncertain whether adults are susceptible to changes to binocular vision. We examined binocular vision in adults with longstanding surgical monovision (> or =6 month's duration) to determine whether the binocular visual system remains susceptible to change.
METHODS: Participants included 32 adults with longstanding monovision through laser-assisted in situ keratectomy or photorefractive keratectomy and 20 age-matched control subjects. After full binocular correction, binocular function was measured by using the Randot Stereoacuity Test, the Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Test, and the Worth 4-dot test at near and distance. Monovision patients were grouped as having low anisometropia (<1.5 spherical D) or moderate anisometropia (> or =1.5 spherical D).
RESULTS: Non-parametric analysis of variance revealed a significant difference between group median stereoacuity (H = 16.062; P <.001). Pairwise multiple comparisons indicated both groups with monovision had significantly worse stereoacuity compared with control subjects (P <.05). Median stereoacuity values were 100 seconds of arc for patients with low anisometropia, 150 seconds of arc for patients with moderate anisometropia, and 40 seconds of arc for control subjects. A larger proportion of patients with moderate anisometropia failed the Worth-4 dot test at distance than control subjects (z = 2.619; P =.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Reduced stereoacuity and an absence of foveal fusion in adults with longstanding surgical monovision suggest continued susceptibility of the binocular visual system to anomalous binocular experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11753252     DOI: 10.1067/mpa.2001.119785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  10 in total

1.  A prospective study of the effect of a unilateral macular hole on sensory and motor binocular function and recovery following successful surgery.

Authors:  K Mireskandari; L Garnham; R Sheard; E Ezra; Z J Gregor; J J Sloper
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  [In vitro and in vivo investigations on the treatment of presbyopia using femtosecond lasers].

Authors:  G Gerten; T Ripken; P Breitenfeld; R R Krueger; O Kermani; H Lubatschowski; U Oberheide
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Iatrogenic diplopia [corrected].

Authors:  Julio González-Martín-Moro; Julio José González-López; Marco Sales-Sanz; Andrea Sales-Sanz; Javier González-Martín-Moro; Fernando Gómez-Sanz; Mar González-Manrique; Belén Pilo-de-la-Fuente; Roberto García-Leal
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Binocular function in pseudophakic children.

Authors:  Malcolm R Ing
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2009-12

5.  Binocular Visual Function in a Pre-Presbyopic Patient with Uniocular Cataract Undergoing Cataract Surgery with a Multifocal Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Laura J Wood; Jasleen K Jolly; Markus Groppe; Larry Benjamin; James F Kirwan; Nishal Patel; Mostafa A Elgohary; Robert E MacLaren
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-16

6.  The effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Daniel S Durrie
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

Review 7.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 8.  Pseudophakic monovision is an important surgical approach to being spectacle-free.

Authors:  Jianhe Xiao; Caihui Jiang; Maonian Zhang
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 9.  PresbyLASIK: A review of PresbyMAX, Supracor, and laser blended vision: Principles, planning, and outcomes.

Authors:  Rohit Shetty; Sheetal Brar; Mohita Sharma; Zelda Dadachanji; Vaitheeswaran Ganesan Lalgudi
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Functional Outcomes and Reading Speeds following PRESBYOND LBV Using Nonlinear Aspheric Ablation Profiles Combined with Micro-Monovision.

Authors:  Sheetal Brar; Smith Snehal Sute; Sheetal N Bagare; Sri Ganesh
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 1.909

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.