Literature DB >> 11751227

How to reconstruct a large genetic network from n gene perturbations in fewer than n(2) easy steps.

A Wagner1.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The reconstruction of genetic networks is the holy grail of functional genomics. Its core task is to identify the causal structure of a gene network, that is, to distinguish direct from indirect regulatory interactions among gene products. In other words, to reconstruct a genetic network is to identify, for each network gene, which other genes and their activity the gene influences directly. Crucial to this task are perturbations of gene activity. Genomic technology permits large-scale experiments perturbing the activity of many genes and assessing the effect of each perturbation on all other genes in a genome. However, such experiments cannot distinguish between direct and indirect effects of a genetic perturbation.
RESULTS: I present an algorithm to reconstruct direct regulatory interactions in gene networks from the results of gene perturbation experiments. The algorithm is based on a graph representation of genetic networks and applies to networks of arbitrary size and complexity. Algorithmic complexity in both storage and time is low, less than O(n(2)). In practice, the algorithm can reconstruct networks of several thousand genes in mere CPU seconds on a desktop workstation. AVAILABILITY: A perl implementation of the algorithm is given in the Appendix. CONTACT: wagnera@unm.edu

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11751227     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  39 in total

1.  Reverse engineering gene networks: integrating genetic perturbations with dynamical modeling.

Authors:  Jesper Tegner; M K Stephen Yeung; Jeff Hasty; James J Collins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Pleiotropy, homeostasis, and functional networks based on assays of cardiovascular traits in genetically randomized populations.

Authors:  Joseph H Nadeau; Lindsay C Burrage; Joe Restivo; Yoh-Han Pao; Gary Churchill; Brian D Hoit
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  An integer programming formulation to identify the sparse network architecture governing differentiation of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Ipsita Banerjee; Spandan Maiti; Natesh Parashurama; Martin Yarmush
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Topology and static response of interaction networks in molecular biology.

Authors:  Ovidiu Radulescu; Sandrine Lagarrigue; Anne Siegel; Philippe Veber; Michel Le Borgne
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Inherent size constraints on prokaryote gene networks due to "accelerating" growth.

Authors:  M J Gagen; J S Mattick
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.919

6.  Gene expression dynamics in randomly varying environments.

Authors:  Michael W Smiley; Stephen R Proulx
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  A proof of the DBRF-MEGN method, an algorithm for deducing minimum equivalent gene networks.

Authors:  Koji Kyoda; Kotaro Baba; Hiroaki Kitano; Shuichi Onami
Journal:  Source Code Biol Med       Date:  2011-06-24

8.  Selection of statistical thresholds in graphical models.

Authors:  Anthony Almudevar
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2010-03-04

9.  How to understand the cell by breaking it: network analysis of gene perturbation screens.

Authors:  Florian Markowetz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  How to identify essential genes from molecular networks?

Authors:  Gabriel del Rio; Dirk Koschützki; Gerardo Coello
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2009-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.