Literature DB >> 11747324

Validating automated screening for psychological distress by means of computer touchscreens for use in routine oncology practice.

A Cull1, A Gould, A House, A Smith, V Strong, G Velikova, P Wright, P Selby.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to confirm the validity of using touchscreen computers for screening for clinically significant levels of distress among cancer patients in routine oncology practice. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), EORTC Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ-C30), Mental Health Inventory-MHI5 and a Concerns Checklist were administered via touchscreen computer to 172 chemotherapy out-patients, twice, 2-4 weeks apart. A standard psychiatric interview (Present State Examination - PSE) was conducted within a week of the second assessment. On interview, 23% of patients were identified as 'cases'. Using the available data (questionnaires, sociodemographic details, self-reported past psychiatric history), the best screening strategy combined scores from MHI-5 and HADS from a single time-point with the following rules: if MHI-5 < 11 = non-case; if MHI-5 > or = 11 then use HADS; then, if HADS > or = 9 = 'case' (sensitivity 85%; specificity 71%; misclassification rate 26%; positive predictive value 47%). The computerized screening system enabled data to be collected, scored, collated and reported in real time to identify patients who warrant further clinical assessment. It offers the potential for improving 'case' detection in routine oncology practice while reducing the burden of questions put to 'non-cases'. Further work is needed to develop optimal choice of screening questions for this purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11747324      PMCID: PMC2364000          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  25 in total

Review 1.  ABC of mental health. Common mental health problems in hospital.

Authors:  A Ramirez; A House
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-06-07

2.  Performance of screening and diagnostic tests. Application of receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  J M Murphy; D M Berwick; M C Weinstein; J F Borus; S H Budman; G L Klerman
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1987-06

Review 3.  Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review.

Authors:  S M Gilbody; A O House; T A Sheldon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-17

4.  Screening for adjustment disorders and major depressive disorders in cancer in-patients.

Authors:  D Razavi; N Delvaux; C Farvacques; E Robaye
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 9.319

5.  Screening for psychiatric disorders in a lymphoma out-patient population.

Authors:  D Razavi; N Delvaux; A Bredart; M Paesmans; L Debusscher; D Bron; P Stryckmans
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Psychiatric disorder in patients with advanced breast cancer: prevalence and associated factors.

Authors:  K L Pinder; A J Ramírez; M E Black; M A Richards; W M Gregory; R D Rubens
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Performance of a five-item mental health screening test.

Authors:  D M Berwick; J M Murphy; P A Goldman; J E Ware; A J Barsky; M C Weinstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Screening for psychiatric morbidity in patients with advanced breast cancer: validation of two self-report questionnaires.

Authors:  P Hopwood; A Howell; P Maguire
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Psychiatric morbidity in patients with advanced cancer of the breast: prevalence measured by two self-rating questionnaires.

Authors:  P Hopwood; A Howell; P Maguire
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  24 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess social difficulties in routine oncology practice.

Authors:  E P Wright; M Kiely; C Johnston; A B Smith; A Cull; P J Selby
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  The clinical significance of quality of life assessments in oncology: a summary for clinicians.

Authors:  Jeff A Sloan; Marlene H Frost; Rick Berzon; Amylou Dueck; Gordon Guyatt; Carol Moinpour; Mirjam Sprangers; Carol Ferrans; David Cella
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Issues in the design of Internet-based systems for collecting patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  James B Jones; Claire F Snyder; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Taking PROs and patient-centered care seriously: incremental and disruptive ideas for incorporating PROs in oncology practice.

Authors:  Molla Sloane Donaldson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-11-09       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  A review and recommendations for optimal outcome measures of anxiety, depression and general distress in studies evaluating psychosocial interventions for English-speaking adults with heterogeneous cancer diagnoses.

Authors:  Tim Luckett; Phyllis N Butow; Madeleine T King; Mayumi Oguchi; Gaynor Heading; Nadine A Hackl; Nicole Rankin; Melanie A Price
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Development, feasibility and compliance of a web-based system for very frequent QOL and symptom home self-assessment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  N Bush; G Donaldson; C Moinpour; M Haberman; D Milliken; V Markle; J Lauson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Depression screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 administered on a touch screen computer.

Authors:  Jesse R Fann; Donna L Berry; Seth Wolpin; Mary Austin-Seymour; Nigel Bush; Barbara Halpenny; William B Lober; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Is my patient suffering clinically significant emotional distress? Demonstration of a probabilities approach to evaluating algorithms for screening for distress.

Authors:  Kerrie Clover; Gregory Leigh Carter; Andrew Mackinnon; Catherine Adams
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Longitudinal comparison of three depression measures in adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Shelley A Johns; Kurt Kroenke; Erin E Krebs; Dale E Theobald; Jingwei Wu; Wanzhu Tu
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Randomized controlled trial to test a computerized psychosocial cancer assessment and referral program: methods and research design.

Authors:  Erin L O'Hea; Alexandra Cutillo; Laura Dietzen; Tina Harralson; Grant Grissom; Sharina Person; Edwin D Boudreaux
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.