Literature DB >> 11747036

Lack of mutagenic and co-mutagenic effects of magnetic fields during magnetic resonance imaging.

W G Schreiber1, E M Teichmann, I Schiffer, J Hast, W Akbari, H Georgi, R Graf, M Hehn, H W Spiebeta, M Thelen, F Oesch, J G Hengstler.   

Abstract

Mutagenic and co-mutagenic effects of static, pulsed bipolar gradient, and high-frequency magnetic fields, as well as combinations of them, were examined using the Ames test. The Ames test using Salmonella typhimurium bacteria, wild-type strain RTA, preincubation assay, without metabolic activation, was performed. All combinations of magnetic fields were tested with and without co-exposure to N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine and benzo[a]pyrene-4,5-oxide, ethylene oxide, carboplatin, or cisplatin. As expected, chemical mutagens caused a clear-cut increase of the revertants in the Ames test. However, neither the static fields nor a combination of a static magnetic field with the time-varying bipolar gradient field or a pulsed high-frequency magnetic field caused an alteration in the number of revertants in the Ames test. No co-mutagenic effect of any magnetic field combination was observed. In conclusion, magnetic fields used during clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were neither mutagenic nor co-mutagenic. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11747036     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mapping fetal brain development in utero using magnetic resonance imaging: the Big Bang of brain mapping.

Authors:  Colin Studholme
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Cortex reorganization of Xenopus laevis eggs in strong static magnetic fields.

Authors:  Daniel Mietchen; Jörg W Jakobi; Hans-Peter Richter
Journal:  Biomagn Res Technol       Date:  2005-12-13

Review 3.  Bioeffects of static magnetic fields: oxidative stress, genotoxic effects, and cancer studies.

Authors:  Soumaya Ghodbane; Aida Lahbib; Mohsen Sakly; Hafedh Abdelmelek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Comments on potential health effects of MRI-induced DNA lesions: quality is more important to consider than quantity.

Authors:  M A Hill; P O'Neill; W G McKenna
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  The Effect of Contrast Enhanced Abdominopelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Expression and Methylation Level of ATM and AKT Genes.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Jalali; Hossein Mozdarani; Hossein Ghanaati
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 2.479

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.