Literature DB >> 11745902

Investigation of 5-FU disposition after oral administration of capecitabine, a triple-prodrug of 5-FU, using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model in a human cancer xenograft model: comparison of the simulated 5-FU exposures in the tumour tissue between human and xenograft model.

Y Tsukamoto1, Y Kato, M Ura, I Horii, T Ishikawa, H Ishitsuka, Y Sugiyama.   

Abstract

The nonlinear pharmacokinetics of capecitabine, a triple prodrug of 5-FU preferentially activated in tumour tissues, was investigated in human cancer xenograft models. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model integrating the activation process of capecitabine to 5-FU and 5-FU elimination was constructed to describe the concentration/time profiles of capecitabine and its three metabolites, including 5-FU, in blood and organs. All the biochemical parameters (enzyme kinetic parameters, plasma protein binding and tissue binding of capecitabine and its metabolites) integrated in this model were measured in vitro. The simulated curves for the blood and tumour concentrations of capecitabine and its metabolites can basically describe the observed values. A simple prodrug of 5-FU, doxifluridine, is known to be activated to 5-FU to some extent in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, causing diarrhoea, which is the dose limiting side effect of doxifluridine. Consequently, the therapeutic index (the ratio of 5-FU AUC in the tumour to that in GI) after the administration of effective dose capecitabine was predicted by this PBPK model and found to be five times and 3000 times greater than that of doxifluridine and 5-FU, respectively. This was compatible with the previous result for the difference in the ratio of the toxic dose to the minimum effective dose between capecitabine and doxifluridine, suggesting that 5-FU preferentially accumulates in tumour tissue after oral administration of capecitabine compared with the other drugs (doxifluridine and 5-FU). The 5-FU AUC in tumour tissue of human cancer xenograft models at the minimum effective dose was comparable with those estimated for humans at the clinical dose. In addition, the predicted therapeutic indices at the respective doses were correlated well between humans and mice (xenograft model). These results suggest that the 5-FU AUC in human tumour tissue at its clinically effective dose can be predicted based on the PBPK model inasmuch as the 5-FU AUC in a human cancer xenograft model at its effective dose may be measured or simulated. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11745902     DOI: 10.1002/bdd.250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos        ISSN: 0142-2782            Impact factor:   1.627


  5 in total

Review 1.  Whole body pharmacokinetic models.

Authors:  Ivan Nestorov
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Use of probabilistic modeling within a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict sulfamethazine residue withdrawal times in edible tissues in swine.

Authors:  Jennifer Buur; Ronald Baynes; Geof Smith; Jim Riviere
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in new drug development: the capecitabine experience.

Authors:  Karen S Blesch; Ronald Gieschke; Yuko Tsukamoto; Bruno G Reigner; Hans U Burger; Jean-Louis Steimer
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  The feasibility of enzyme targeted activation for amino acid/dipeptide monoester prodrugs of floxuridine; cathepsin D as a potential targeted enzyme.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Tsume; Gordon L Amidon
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  A Sensitive and Efficient Method for Determination of Capecitabine and Its Five Metabolites in Human Plasma Based on One-Step Liquid-Liquid Extraction.

Authors:  Zhipeng Wang; Xinxing Li; Yang Yang; Feng Zhang; Mingming Li; Wei Chen; Shouhong Gao; Wansheng Chen
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 2.193

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.