Literature DB >> 11745507

Changing face and different countenances of prostate cancer: racial and geographic differences in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), stage, and grade trends in the PSA era.

A B Jani1, F Vaida, G Hanks, S Asbell, O Sartor, J W Moul, M Roach, D Brachman, U Kalokhe, R Muller-Runkel, P Ray, L Ignacio, A Awan, R R Weichselbaum, S Vijayakumar.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to examine changes in pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), stage, and grade over the past decade as a function of race and geographic region. A multiinstitutional database representing 6,790 patients (1,417 African-American, 5,373 white) diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer between 1988 and 1997 was constructed. PSA, stage, and grade data were tabulated by calendar year and region, and time trend analyses based on race and region were performed. There was an overall decline of PSA of 0.8%/year, which was significant (P = 0.0001), with a faster rate of decline in African-Americans (1.9%/year) than for whites (0.6%/year). The odds ratio (OR) for a stage shift was 1.09, which was significant (P < 0.0001), and this shift was greater in whites. The OR for an overall grade shift was 1.15, which was significant (P < 0.0001). Although grade and PSA trends were similar for the different regions, there were significant regional differences in stage trends. The implications are that the face of prostate cancer has changed over the past decade; i.e., the distributions of stage, grade, and PSA (the most important prognosticators) have changed. In addition, the countenances of that face are different for whites and African-Americans. For African-Americans, this is good news: the stage, grade, and PSA distributions are more favorable now than before. For whites, the trends are more complex and more dependent on region. These findings should be used for future clinical and health-policy decisions in the screening and treatment of prostate cancer. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11745507     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  12 in total

1.  Prostate cancer screening and detection in inner-city and underserved men.

Authors:  Satoshi Anai; John Pendleton; Peter Wludyka; Christopher Williams; Leah Nelms; Curtis Pettaway; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Evolution of the clinical presentation of men undergoing radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Ashley E Ross; Misop Han; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Is prostate cancer stage migration continuing for black men in the PSA era?

Authors:  R W Dobbs; D T Greenwald; H Wadhwa; V L Freeman; M R Abern
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.554

4.  Implementation of Dynamically Updated Prediction Models at the Point of Care at a Major Cancer Center: Making Nomograms More Like Netflix.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Mathew Kent; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  The precise role of ethnicity and family history on aggressive prostate cancer: a review analysis.

Authors:  Isaac J Powell
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.436

6.  Assessment of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging (sixth and seventh editions) for clinically localized prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy and comparison with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk-stratification method.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Tianyu Li; Karthik Devarajan; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Omega-3 fatty acids, genetic variants in COX-2 and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Adam C Reese; Vincent Fradet; John S Witte
Journal:  J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics       Date:  2009-09-23

8.  Childhood height and birth weight in relation to future prostate cancer risk: a cohort study based on the copenhagen school health records register.

Authors:  Michael B Cook; Michael Gamborg; Julie Aarestrup; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Jennifer L Baker
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  The Will Rogers phenomenon, breast cancer and race.

Authors:  Mary R Nittala; Eswar K Mundra; S Packianathan; Divyang Mehta; Maria L Smith; William C Woods; Shawn McKinney; Barbara S Craft; Srinivasan Vijayakumar
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Are urine flow-volume nomograms developed on Caucasian men optimally applicable for Indian men? Need for appraisal of flow-volume relations in local population.

Authors:  Mayank M Agarwal; Sunirmal Choudhury; Arup K Mandal; Ravimohan Mavuduru; Shrawan K Singh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.