OBJECTIVES: To compare the sensitivity and accuracy of the mechanical imaging system (MI system) to that of the simulated digital rectal examination (DRE) in detecting nodules within fabricated rubber prostate phantoms. Mechanical imaging is a new technology for visualizing and characterizing tissues using mechanical strain and stress data. METHODS: Twelve rubber phantoms were designed to simulate human prostates. Ten phantoms contained hard nodules in various locations. Two phantoms contained no nodules. Each model was examined with the MI system by a urologist (R.E.W.) and research student. Three-dimensional images of the examined prostate phantoms with and without nodules were generated by the MI system software. Blind DRE was performed on each phantom independently by the urologist and student. The results of the MI examinations and DREs were compared for sensitivity in detecting the presence and location of nodules within the prostate phantoms. RESULTS: Three-dimensional MI images reconstructed from both the student and the urologist examination data demonstrated 100% of the nodules in the appropriate locations. The DREs by the urologist detected 83% of the nodules in the appropriate locations. The DREs by the student detected 67% of the nodules in the appropriate locations. CONCLUSIONS: The prostate MI system allowed the detection of nodules in the prostate phantoms with sensitivity exceeding that of an experienced urologist. In contrast to the DRE, the results of the MI examination appear to be independent of the operator's experience. Therefore, the MI system is a promising means of accurate, sensitive, objective, and recordable detection of hard nodules within the prostate.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the sensitivity and accuracy of the mechanical imaging system (MI system) to that of the simulated digital rectal examination (DRE) in detecting nodules within fabricated rubber prostate phantoms. Mechanical imaging is a new technology for visualizing and characterizing tissues using mechanical strain and stress data. METHODS: Twelve rubber phantoms were designed to simulate human prostates. Ten phantoms contained hard nodules in various locations. Two phantoms contained no nodules. Each model was examined with the MI system by a urologist (R.E.W.) and research student. Three-dimensional images of the examined prostate phantoms with and without nodules were generated by the MI system software. Blind DRE was performed on each phantom independently by the urologist and student. The results of the MI examinations and DREs were compared for sensitivity in detecting the presence and location of nodules within the prostate phantoms. RESULTS: Three-dimensional MI images reconstructed from both the student and the urologist examination data demonstrated 100% of the nodules in the appropriate locations. The DREs by the urologist detected 83% of the nodules in the appropriate locations. The DREs by the student detected 67% of the nodules in the appropriate locations. CONCLUSIONS: The prostate MI system allowed the detection of nodules in the prostate phantoms with sensitivity exceeding that of an experienced urologist. In contrast to the DRE, the results of the MI examination appear to be independent of the operator's experience. Therefore, the MI system is a promising means of accurate, sensitive, objective, and recordable detection of hard nodules within the prostate.
Authors: Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra Journal: Curr Med Imaging Rev Date: 2011-11
Authors: Mitchell M Huang; Hiten D Patel; Zhuo T Su; Christian P Pavlovich; Alan W Partin; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mohamad E Allaf Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-09-14 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Vladimir Egorov; Thomas Kearney; Stanley B Pollak; Chand Rohatgi; Noune Sarvazyan; Suren Airapetian; Stephanie Browning; Armen Sarvazyan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2009-03-21 Impact factor: 4.872