Literature DB >> 11744477

Morbidity of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy in patients receiving immunosuppression.

R Wammack1, B Djavan, M Remzi, M Susani, M Marberger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate the safety and early and delayed morbidity of transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsies in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy.
METHODS: A total of 59 men receiving immunosuppressive agents after kidney transplantation, with a total prostate-specific antigen level between 4 and 10 ng/mL, were prospectively studied. All patients underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided sextant biopsy plus two additional transition zone biopsies. Biopsy samples were also obtained from suspicious areas identified during TRUS and digital rectal examination. The immediate and delayed morbidity, patient satisfaction, and complication rates were recorded and compared with the morbidity data recorded in the same period from 1051 men in the European Prostate Cancer Detection study.
RESULTS: Of the 59 subjects, prostate cancer was detected in 17; 231 men were found to have cancer in the European Prostate Cancer Detection Study. Minor or no discomfort was observed in 88% and 92% of the transplant recipients and controls, respectively (P = 0.31). Twelve percent versus 8% experienced pain. Early morbidity included rectal bleeding (2.6% versus 2.1%, P = 0.19), severe hematuria (0.8% versus 0.7%, P = 0.08), and moderate to severe vasovagal episodes (1.9% versus 2.8%, P = 0.04). Late morbidity included fever (3.5% versus 2.9%, P = 0.1), hematospermia (11.0% versus 9.8%, P = 0.1), recurrent mild hematuria (17.4% versus 16.8%, P = 0.08), persistent dysuria (6.4% versus 7.2%, P = 0.2), and urinary tract infections (12.0% versus 10.9%, P = 0.08). Major complications were rare: urosepsis (0% versus 0.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study demonstrate that TRUS-guided biopsy of the prostate is generally well tolerated, with minor morbidity, in patients receiving immunosuppression. No differences were noted in pain apprehension or early and delayed morbidity, suggesting that TRUS-guided biopsies can be performed safely in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11744477     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01406-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  [Complications of transrectal prostate biopsy. Determination of current status].

Authors:  H W Gottfried; B Volkmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  A life-threatening hematochesia after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy in a prostate cancer case presenting with lymphedema.

Authors:  Yücel Ustündağ; Cetin Yeşilli; Selim Aydemir; Ahmet Savranlar; Kamuran Yazicioğlu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Urological Cancers and Kidney Transplantation: a Literature Review.

Authors:  Cristian Axel Hernández-Gaytán; Francisco Rodríguez-Covarrubias; Ricardo A Castillejos-Molina; Andrés Hernández-Porras; Ignacio Tobia; Justin M Dubin; Ana María Autrán-Gómez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  [Blindness after prostate biopsy].

Authors:  J Heinzelbecker; C von Zastrow; P Alken
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Benjamin A Sherer; Krishnan Warrior; Karl Godlewski; Martin Hertl; Oyedolamu Olaitan; Ajay Nehra; Leslie Allan Deane
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Hemosepermia after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy: A prospective study.

Authors:  M Abdelkhalek; M Abdelshafy; H Elhelaly; M Kamal
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2013-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.