Literature DB >> 11743835

Similar effectiveness of paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline in primary care: a randomized trial.

K Kroenke1, S L West, R Swindle, A Gilsenan, G J Eckert, R Dolor, P Stang, X H Zhou, R Hays, M Weinberger.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most commonly prescribed class of antidepressant, yet it is not known whether one SSRI is more effective than another.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 3 SSRIs (paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline) in depressed primary care patients.
DESIGN: Open-label, randomized, intention-to-treat trial, with patient enrollment occurring in April-November 1999.
SETTING: Thirty-seven clinics in 2 US primary care research networks. PATIENTS: A total of 573 depressed adult patients for whom their primary care physician thought that antidepressant therapy was warranted and who completed a baseline interview.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive paroxetine (n = 189), fluoxetine (n = 193), or sertraline (n = 191) for 9 months. Primary care physicians were allowed to switch patients to a different SSRI or non-SSRI antidepressant if they did not adequately respond to or tolerate the initial SSRI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was change in the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary score (range, 0-100), compared across treatment groups at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months. Secondary outcomes included other depression and psychological measures, multiple measures of social and work functioning, and other domains of health-related quality of life, such as physical functioning, concentration and memory, vitality, bodily pain, sleep, and sexual functioning.
RESULTS: Follow-up interviews were successfully completed in 94% of patients at 1 month, 87% at 3 months, 84% at 6 months, and 79% at 9 months. Responses to the 3 SSRIs were comparable on all measures and at all time points. The mean change in the SF-36 Mental Component Summary score at 9 months was + 15.8 in the paroxetine group, + 15.1 in the fluoxetine group, and + 17.4 in the sertraline group. The drugs were also associated with similar incidences of adverse effects and discontinuation rates.
CONCLUSIONS: The SSRI antidepressants paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline were similar in effectiveness for depressive symptoms as well as multiple domains of health-related quality of life over the entire 9 months of this trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11743835     DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.23.2947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  62 in total

1.  Implementing an office system to improve primary care management of depression.

Authors:  Neil Korsen; Peter Scott; Allen J Dietrich; Thomas Oxman
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2003

Review 2.  A review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments.

Authors:  Jennifer H Lofland; Laura Pizzi; Kevin D Frick
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Elucidation of The Behavioral Program and Neuronal Network Encoded by Dorsal Raphe Serotonergic Neurons.

Authors:  Daniel J Urban; Hu Zhu; Catherine A Marcinkiewcz; Michael Michaelides; Hidehiro Oshibuchi; Darren Rhea; Dipendra K Aryal; Martilias S Farrell; Emily Lowery-Gionta; Reid H J Olsen; William C Wetsel; Thomas L Kash; Yasmin L Hurd; Laurence H Tecott; Bryan L Roth
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Industry Support of Medical Research: Important Opportunity or Treacherous Pitfall?

Authors:  William M Tierney; Eric M Meslin; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Team Science Approach to Developing Consensus on Research Good Practices for Practice-Based Research Networks: A Case Study.

Authors:  Kimberly Campbell-Voytal; Jeanette M Daly; Zsolt J Nagykaldi; Cheryl B Aspy; Rowena J Dolor; Lyle J Fagnan; Barcey T Levy; Hannah L Palac; LeAnn Michaels; V Beth Patterson; Miria Kano; Paul D Smith; Andrew L Sussman; Robert Williams; Pamela Sterling; Maeve O'Beirne; Anne Victoria Neale
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.689

6.  Academic-Industry Research Partnerships: an Emerging Opportunity or Just Smoke and Mirrors?

Authors:  Michael Hochman; Rachael Bedard
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The effect of improving primary care depression management on employee absenteeism and productivity. A randomized trial.

Authors:  Kathryn Rost; Jeffrey L Smith; Miriam Dickinson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Principles for evidence-based drug formulary policy.

Authors:  Gregory E Simon; Bruce M Psaty; Jennifer Berg Hrachovec; Marc Mora
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Unemployment, job retention, and productivity loss among employees with depression.

Authors:  Debra Lerner; David A Adler; Hong Chang; Leueen Lapitsky; Maggie Y Hood; Carla Perissinotto; John Reed; Thomas J McLaughlin; Ernst R Berndt; William H Rogers
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  The association of depression and anxiety with health-related quality of life in cancer patients with depression and/or pain.

Authors:  Linda F Brown; Kurt Kroenke; Dale E Theobald; Jingwei Wu; Wanzhu Tu
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.