Literature DB >> 11743396

From genotype to phenotype: the differential expression of FGF, FGFR, and TGFbeta genes characterizes human cranioskeletal development and reflects clinical presentation in FGFR syndromes.

J A Britto1, R D Evans, R D Hayward, B M Jones.   

Abstract

Mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) genes 1, 2, and 3 are causal in a number of craniofacial dysostosis syndromes featuring craniosynostosis with basicranial and midfacial deformity. Great clinical variability is displayed in the pathologic phenotypes encountered. To investigate the influence of developmental genetics on clinical diversity in these syndromes, the expression of several genes implicated in their pathology was studied at sequential stages of normal human embryo-fetal cranial base and facial ossification (n = 6). At 8 weeks of gestation, FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 are equally expressed throughout the predifferentiated mesenchyme of the cranium, the endochondral skull base, and midfacial mesenchyme. Both clinically significant isoforms of FGFR2, IgIIIa/c and IgIIIa/b, are coexpressed in maxillary and basicranial ossification. By 10 to 13 weeks, FGFR1 and FGFR2 are broadly expressed in epithelia, osteogenic, and chondrogenic cell lineages. FGFR3, however, is maximally expressed in dental epithelia and proliferating chondrocytes of the skull base, but poorly expressed in the osteogenic tissues of the midface. FGF2 and FGF4, but not FGF7, and TGFbeta1 and TGFbeta3 are expressed throughout both osteogenic and chondrogenic tissues in early human craniofacial skeletogenesis. Maximal FGFR expression in the skull base proposes a pivotal role for syndromic growth dysplasia at this site. Paucity of FGFR3 expression in human midfacial development correlates with the relatively benign human mutant FGFR3 midfacial phenotypes. The regulation of FGFR expression in human craniofacial skeletogenesis against background excess ligand and selected cofactors may therefore play a profound role in the pathologic craniofacial development of children bearing FGFR mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11743396     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200112000-00030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  21 in total

1.  Mesodermal expression of Fgfr2S252W is necessary and sufficient to induce craniosynostosis in a mouse model of Apert syndrome.

Authors:  Greg Holmes; Claudio Basilico
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Osteocyte Death and Bone Overgrowth in Mice Lacking Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors 1 and 2 in Mature Osteoblasts and Osteocytes.

Authors:  Jennifer McKenzie; Craig Smith; Kannan Karuppaiah; Joshua Langberg; Matthew J Silva; David M Ornitz
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  FGF signaling in the developing endochondral skeleton.

Authors:  David M Ornitz
Journal:  Cytokine Growth Factor Rev       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 7.638

4.  Association between the FGFR1 rs13317 single nucleotide polymorphism and orbitale-nasion depth based on cephalometric images.

Authors:  Mohamed Adel; Tetsutaro Yamaguchi; Daisuke Tomita; Yong-Il Kim; Masahiro Takahashi; Takatoshi Nakawaki; Yu Hikita; Shugo Haga; Mohamed Nadim; Akira Kawaguchi; Mutsumi Isa; Walid El-Kenany; Abbadi A El-Kadi; Soo-Byung Park; Hajime Ishida; Koutaro Maki; Ryosuke Kimura
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Quantification of shape and cell polarity reveals a novel mechanism underlying malformations resulting from related FGF mutations during facial morphogenesis.

Authors:  Xin Li; Nathan M Young; Stephen Tropp; Diane Hu; Yanhua Xu; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 6.  Physical manifestations of neurodevelopmental disruption: are minor physical anomalies part of the syndrome of schizophrenia?

Authors:  Michael T Compton; Elaine F Walker
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Conditional expression of Spry1 in neural crest causes craniofacial and cardiac defects.

Authors:  Xuehui Yang; Sean Kilgallen; Viktoria Andreeva; Douglas B Spicer; Ilka Pinz; Robert Friesel
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 1.978

8.  MEMO1 drives cranial endochondral ossification and palatogenesis.

Authors:  Eric Van Otterloo; Weiguo Feng; Kenneth L Jones; Nancy E Hynes; David E Clouthier; Lee Niswander; Trevor Williams
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Expanding the schizophrenia phenotype: a composite evaluation of neurodevelopmental markers.

Authors:  John P John; Vikram Arunachalam; Bhuvaneshwari Ratnam; Mohan K Isaac
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 3.735

Review 10.  Molecular mechanisms of midfacial developmental defects.

Authors:  Akiko Suzuki; Dhruvee R Sangani; Afreen Ansari; Junichi Iwata
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.780

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.