Literature DB >> 11743274

Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience.

Bertrand Guillonneau1, François Rozet, Xavier Cathelineau, Frank Lay, Eric Barret, Jean-Dominique Doublet, Hervé Baumert, Guy Vallancien.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluated the morbidity, and minor and major complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgical team.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 28, 1998 and February 28, 2001, 567 patients 42 to 77 years old (mean age plus or minus standard deviation 63.5 +/- 6) with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, including 458 (80.6%), without lymphadenectomy. Mean body mass index was 25.3 +/- 2.9 (range 17.3 to 37.5). American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 1 to 3 in 65%, 27% and 8% of cases, respectively. A total of 12 patients (2.1%) had undergone intra-abdominal surgery below the mesocolon and 40 had undergone urological surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative data were recorded as well as all complications and their severity score within the initial 30 days postoperatively.
RESULTS: A total of 105 complications were observed in 97 patients (17.1%), including 21 major (3.7%) and 83 minor (14.6%) complications. Of the patients 21 (3.7%) underwent reoperation for a postoperative complication, including 10 (1.76%) who required an intensive care unit stay. Seven cases (1.2%) were converted to conventional retropubic radical prostatectomy. Mean blood loss was 380 +/- 195 ml. and the overall transfusion rate was 4.9%. In 2 patients (0.3%) deep vein thrombosis was associated with another surgical complication but not with pulmonary embolism. Urological, bowel and hemorrhagic complications represented 66.6%, 16.2% and 7.6% (total 89.4%) of all complications, and 20%, 33.3% and 33.3% of all repeat interventions, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was performed according to the defined protocol with no complications in 82.9% of patients. The morbidity of this approach compares favorably with that of retropubic surgery. Growing experience and knowledge sharing concerning the prevention and early management of these complications would make possible a further decrease in the morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11743274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  50 in total

1.  Evolution of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE)--technical improvements and development of a nerve-sparing, potency-preserving approach.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Michael C Truss; Minh Do; Robert Rabenalt; Heidemarie Pfeiffer; Michael Dunzinger; Bernd Aedtner; Christian G Stief; Udo Jonas; Wolfgang Dorschner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Results after 300 procedures].

Authors:  J-U Stolzenburg; M C Truss; R Rabenalt; M Do; H Pfeiffer; A Bekos; J Neuhaus; C G Stief; U Jonas; W Dorschner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Evolution of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and outcome.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Odysseas Andrikopoulos; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Iason Kyriazis; Minh Do; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  [Radical prostatectomy - pro robotic].

Authors:  R Gillitzer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Authors:  J B Basillote; T E Ahlering; D W Skarecky; D I Lee; R V Clayman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Long-term functional and oncological results after retroperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy according to a prospective evaluation of 550 patients.

Authors:  L Goeman; L Salomon; A La De Taille; D Vordos; A Hoznek; R Yiou; C C Abbou
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Categorisation of complications of endoscopic extraperitoneal and laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Robert Rabenalt; Minh Do; Benjamin Lee; Michael C Truss; Hartwig Schwaibold; Martin Burchardt; Udo Jonas; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 9.  Complications of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): prevention and management.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Robert Rabenalt; Minh Do; Benjamin Lee; Michael C Truss; Alan McNeill; Martin Burchardt; Udo Jonas; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-11-04       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  The single-knot method with Lapra-Ty clips is useful for training surgeons in vesicourethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Takahiro Yasui; Yasunori Itoh; Tetsuji Maruyama; Hidetoshi Akita; Yoshihiro Hashimoto; Keiichi Tozawa; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.