Literature DB >> 11743038

Anxiety in a cohort of Swiss women participating in a mammographic screening programme.

G Meystre-Agustoni1, F Paccaud, A Jeannin, F Dubois-Arber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To follow up anxiety in a cohort of women screened for breast cancer.
METHODS: Within the framework of a pilot screening programme for breast cancer in the Canton of Vaud (Switzerland), a cohort of 924 participants aged 50-70 years were invited to answer questions on anxiety related to mammography screening. Anxiety was measured using a specific tool, the psychological consequences questionnaire (PCQ), and a new single item, direct question, breast cancer anxiety indicator (BCA). Participants were asked to fill in the questionnaire at four different phases: at screening, before the result, and 2 and 8 weeks after the result. The final response rate was 93.7%. Predictors of anxiety at each phase were assessed using multiple regression.
RESULTS: Among those screening negative (94.7%), anxiety at screening was very low and remained so during the screening process. Among those screening false positive, anxiety was significantly higher 8 weeks after having received a negative diagnosis. Predictors of anxiety before screening were lower education and higher age, with a strong exogenous anxiety component. For subsequent phases, the initial anxiety score and education were the main determinants. Furthermore, a false positive result at screening was the most important predictor of anxiety 2 months after negative diagnosis. Anxiety measured with the BCA was strongly correlated with the PCQ.
CONCLUSION: Anxiety was very low at screening and remained so during the process for negative women. Initial anxiety level was a strong predictor of anxiety during the entire process, up to 8 weeks after a negative result, and could be easily assessed using the BCA. The sustained higher anxiety level among those screening false positive is an undesirable side effect of the programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11743038     DOI: 10.1136/jms.8.4.213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  9 in total

1.  Point-of-Care HbA1c Testing with the A1cNow Test Kit in General Practice Dental Clinics: A Pilot Study Involving Its Accuracy and Practical Issues in Its Use.

Authors:  Shiela M Strauss; Mary Rosedale; Michael A Pesce; Caroline Juterbock; Navjot Kaur; Joe DePaola; Deborah Goetz; Mark S Wolff; Dolores Malaspina; Ann Danoff
Journal:  Point Care       Date:  2014-12

2.  FIT false-positives in colorectal cancer screening experience psychological distress up to 6 weeks after colonoscopy.

Authors:  M J Denters; M Deutekom; M L Essink-Bot; P M Bossuyt; P Fockens; E Dekker
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Online support: Impact on anxiety in women who experience an abnormal screening mammogram.

Authors:  Eniola T Obadina; Lori L Dubenske; Helene E McDowell; Amy K Atwood; Deborah K Mayer; Ryan W Woods; David H Gustafson; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Measuring the psychological consequences of breast cancer screening: a confirmatory factor analysis of the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire.

Authors:  Andrew Cooper; Helen Aucote
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Psychological distress and quality of life following provision of vascular imaging results of the coronary and carotid arteries to asymptomatic adults: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Joshua R Lewis; Mandy Stanley; Reindolf Anokye; Ben Jackson; James Dimmock; Joanne M Dickson; Lauren C Blekkenhorst; Jonathan M Hodgson
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-11-26

Review 6.  Scanxiety: a scoping review about scan-associated anxiety.

Authors:  Kim Tam Bui; Roger Liang; Belinda E Kiely; Chris Brown; Haryana M Dhillon; Prunella Blinman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Cervical cancer screening service utilisation in UK.

Authors:  Alexander Labeit; Frank Peinemann; Abbi Kedir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening.

Authors:  Monika Eichholzer; Aline Richard; Sabine Rohrmann; Seraina M Schmid; Cornelia Leo; Dorothy J Huang; Uwe Güth
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Communication of cancer screening results by letter, telephone or in person: A mixed methods systematic review of the effect on attendee anxiety, understanding and preferences.

Authors:  Sian Williamson; Jacoby Patterson; Rebecca Crosby; Rebecca Johnson; Harbinder Sandhu; Samantha Johnson; Jacquie Jenkins; Margaret Casey; Olive Kearins; Sian Taylor-Phillips
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-12-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.