Literature DB >> 11742702

Comparison of docetaxel/cisplatin to docetaxel/gemcitabine as first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: early results of a randomized trial.

V Georgoulias1, G Samonis, E Papadakis, A Alexopoulos, X Tsiafaki, A Rapti, M Veslemes, T Grigoratou, P Palamidas, C Kouroussis, D Mavroudis, S Kakolyris, T Giannakakis, J Vlachonikolis.   

Abstract

The study compares docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) and docetaxel plus gemcitabine (DG) regimens for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients were randomized to receive either the DC or the DG combination. They were stratified according to age, performance status (PS) and stage of disease. Three hundred seventeen patients entered the study. Of them, 162 received the DC regimen and 155 the DG regimen. There were no differences in the patients' characteristics between the two study arms. Preliminary analysis included 132 evaluable patients in the DC arm and 114 in the DG arm. Three complete responses (CR) (2.3%) and 39 partial responses (PR) (30%) were documented in the DC arm (response rate (RR) 32.3%; 95% CI 23.87-39.76%), whereas 1 CR (0.9%) and 38 PR (33%) were documented in the DG arm (RR: 33.9%; 95% CI 25.5-42.92%). No differences in the RR, response duration, time to tumor progression, overall survival and 1-year survival were observed between the two groups. Regarding toxicity, there were no significant differences in grade 3-4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia between the two arms. However, grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 40 patients (33%) treated with the DC regimen and in 31 patients (22%) treated with the DG regimen (P=0.01). Twenty-four (16%) patients in the DC arm and 20 (14%) in the DG arm developed febrile neutropenia. There was one death due to sepsis in each arm. Non-haematological toxicity was mild and equal in the two arms, with the exception of grade 3-4 nausea and diarrhoea, which were more frequent in the DC arm. In conclusion, preliminary results showed that the DG regimen was as effective as the DC regimen. The toxicity profile of the DG combination was relatively milder. Hence, cisplatin cannot be considered longer as a mandatory component of chemotherapy against NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11742702     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(01)00417-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  5 in total

1.  Non-platinum doublets were as effective as platinum-based doublets for chemotherapy-naïve advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the era of third-generation agents.

Authors:  Jingwei Jiang; Xiaohua Liang; Xinli Zhou; Ruofan Huang; Zhaohui Chu; Qiong Zhan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Phase I study of gemcitabine, docetaxel and imatinib in refractory and relapsed solid tumors.

Authors:  Biren Saraiya; Rashmi Chugh; Vassiliki Karantza; Janice Mehnert; Rebecca A Moss; Nelli Savkina; Mark N Stein; Laurence H Baker; Thomas Chenevert; Elizabeth A Poplin
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with docetaxel and gemcitabine.

Authors:  O Juan; J Vidal; R Gisbert; J Muñoz; S Maciá; J Gómez-Codina
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Docetaxel plus fractionated cisplatin is a safe and active schedule as first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of a phase II study.

Authors:  José Luis Firvida; Margarita Amenedo; Rubén Rodríguez; Ana González; Mercedes Salgado; Manuel Ramos; Gustavo Losada
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Quantitative comparison of the efficacies and safety profiles of three first-line non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Qian-Yu Yang; Lin Zhu; Hong-Xia Liu; Qing-Shan Zheng; Lu-Jin Li
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 5.988

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.