Literature DB >> 11742309

Cephalometric and physiologic predictors of the efficacy of an adjustable oral appliance for treating obstructive sleep apnea.

Y Liu1, A A Lowe, J A Fleetham, Y C Park.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether any physiologic or cephalometric parameters could be used to predict the efficacy of an adjustable mandibular advancement appliance for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Forty-two male and 5 female patients with OSA were recruited on the basis of baseline polysomnography with a documented Apnea and Hypopnea Index (AHI) greater than 15 per hour. Repeat polysomnography was performed with the appliance in place. Baseline cephalometry was performed for each patient, and follow-up cephalometry was completed for 19 of the subjects. The subjects were divided into 3 groups on the basis of the degree of change in the AHI with oral appliance therapy: good response (> 75% decrease in AHI), moderate response (25% to 75% decrease in AHI), and poor response (< 25% decrease in AHI). Patients with a good response were younger and had smaller upper airways. In a linear regression analysis, the change in AHI (%) was associated with physiologic (age and body mass index), cephalometric (overjet, height of the maxillary molars, vertical height of the hyoid bone), and airway variables. However, changes in either overbite or overjet were not related to changes in any of the polysomnographic variables for the 19 subjects. A stepwise regression analysis revealed a better treatment response with the adjustable mandibular advancement appliance in patients who were younger and had a lower body mass index, a longer maxilla, a smaller oropharynx, a smaller overjet, less erupted maxillary molars, and a larger ratio of vertical airway length to the cross-sectional area of the soft palate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11742309     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.118782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  39 in total

1.  Oral appliance versus continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Michiel H J Doff; Aarnoud Hoekema; Peter J Wijkstra; Johannes H van der Hoeven; James J R Huddleston Slater; Lambert G M de Bont; Boudewijn Stegenga
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Cephalometry and prediction of oral appliance treatment outcome.

Authors:  Andrew Tze Ming Ng; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter Petocz; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 3.  Sleep medicine care under one roof: a proposed model for integrating dentistry and medicine.

Authors:  Sunil Sharma; Greg Essick; David Schwartz; Amy J Aronsky
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Influencing factors on the effect of mandibular advancement device in obstructive sleep apnea patients: analysis on cephalometric and polysomnographic parameters.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Jeong-Whun Kim; In-Young Yoon; Chae Seo Rhee; Chul Hee Lee; Pil-Young Yun
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Dental changes evaluated with a 3D computer-assisted model analysis after long-term tongue retaining device wear in OSA patients.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Alan A Lowe; Arthur M Strauss; Fernanda Riberiro de Almeida; Hiroshi Ueda; John A Fleetham; Bangkang Wang
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.816

6.  Oral Appliance Treatment Response and Polysomnographic Phenotypes of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Hisashi Takaya; Jin Qian; Peter Petocz; Andrew T Ng; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 7.  Anatomically Based Outcome Predictors of Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Intraoral Splint Devices: A Systematic Review of Cephalometric Studies.

Authors:  Luca Guarda-Nardini; Daniele Manfredini; Marta Mion; Gary Heir; Rosario Marchese-Ragona
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-11-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  A prospective 10-year follow-up polygraphic study of patients treated with a mandibular protruding device.

Authors:  Eva Wiman Eriksson; Lena Leissner; Göran Isacsson; Anette Fransson
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.816

9.  CPAP pressure for prediction of oral appliance treatment response in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Craig L Phillips; Amanda Davies; Vasanth K Srinivasan; Oyku Dalci; Brendon J Yee; M Ali Darendeliler; Ronald R Grunstein; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 4.062

10.  Influence of nasal resistance on oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Biao Zeng; Andrew T Ng; Jin Qian; Peter Petocz; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.