Literature DB >> 11737497

The practical, methodological and ethical dilemmas of conducting focus groups with vulnerable clients.

S Owen1.   

Abstract

AIM: This paper presents some of the practical, methodological and ethical dilemmas that were encountered in a study that used focus groups to elicit the views of women with serious and enduring mental health problems about the services they were receiving.
FINDINGS: The dilemmas identified included the time and effort taken to gain access to the women, the role of the researcher as facilitator, communication and interaction in the focus group, accepting the women's reality, and the thin divide between research and therapy.
CONCLUSION: The paper concludes with some recommendations for researchers who are planning to use focus groups to elicit the views of vulnerable clients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Mental Health Therapies

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11737497     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.02030.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  10 in total

1.  From Practice to Research: Training Health Care Providers to Conduct Culturally Relevant Community Focus Groups.

Authors:  Gwenyth R Wallen; Migdalia V Rivera-Goba
Journal:  Hisp Health Care Int       Date:  2003

2.  Patients, prisoners, or people? Women prisoners' experiences of primary care in prison: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Emma Plugge; Nicola Douglas; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Introducing a psychological agenda for understanding somatic symptoms--an area of conflict for clinicians in relation to patients in a multicultural community.

Authors:  Sofie Bäärnhielm; Solvig Ekblad
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2008-09

4.  Understanding infant feeding beliefs, practices and preferred nutrition education and health provider approaches: an exploratory study with Somali mothers in the USA.

Authors:  Lesley Steinman; Mark Doescher; Gina A Keppel; Suzinne Pak-Gorstein; Elinor Graham; Aliya Haq; Donna B Johnson; Paul Spicer
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Anticipatory guidance preferences of Latina migrant farmworker mothers.

Authors:  Jill F Kilanowski
Journal:  J Pediatr Health Care       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 1.812

6.  "You cannot eat rights": a qualitative study of views by Zambian HIV-vulnerable women, youth and MSM on human rights as public health tools.

Authors:  Choolwe Muzyamba; Elena Broaddus; Catherine Campbell
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2015-10-05

7.  Mediation and moderation effects of health system structure and process on the quality of mental health services in Ghana - structural equation modelling.

Authors:  Eric Badu; Anthony Paul O'Brien; Rebecca Mitchell; Akwasi Osei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Silent Voices: Exploring Narratives of Women's Experiences of Health Care Professional Responses to Domestic Violence and Abuse.

Authors:  Julie McGarry; Kathryn Hinsliff-Smith
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2021-06

Review 9.  An integrative review on methodological considerations in mental health research - design, sampling, data collection procedure and quality assurance.

Authors:  Eric Badu; Anthony Paul O'Brien; Rebecca Mitchell
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2019-10-10

10.  Contextualizing the findings of a systematic review on patient and carer experiences of dementia diagnosis and treatment: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Frances Bunn; Katie Sworn; Carol Brayne; Steve Iliffe; Louise Robinson; Claire Goodman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.377

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.