AIMS: Artesunate and artemether are the two most widely used artemisinin derivatives in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, but there is little information on their comparative pharmacokinetics. The aim of this study was to examine the relative oral antimalarial bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of the two derivatives. METHODS: The pharmacokinetic properties of oral artesunate and artemether (4 mg kg(-1)) were compared in a randomized cross-over study of 14 adult patients in western Thailand with acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Antimalarial activity was compared using a previously validated, sensitive bioassay. RESULTS: Despite a 29% lower molar dose, oral artesunate administration resulted in significantly larger mean area under the plasma antimalarial activity time curve and median maximum plasma antimalarial activity than after oral artemether (P <or= 0.02). The mean (95% CI) oral antimalarial bioavailability of artemether, relative to oral artesunate, corrected for molar dose was 58 (40-76)%. The mean (95% CI) relative antimalarial bioavailability of artemether was lower on the first day of treatment, 31 (17-100)%, compared to the second day, 72 (44-118)% (P = 0.018). In vivo parasite clearance and time above the in vitro IC90 were similar for the two drugs, despite considerable differences in Cmax and AUC. CONCLUSIONS: The oral antimalarial bioavailability following artemether was significantly lower than that after artesunate. Artemether oral antimalarial bioavailability is reduced in acute malaria.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Artesunate and artemether are the two most widely used artemisinin derivatives in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, but there is little information on their comparative pharmacokinetics. The aim of this study was to examine the relative oral antimalarial bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of the two derivatives. METHODS: The pharmacokinetic properties of oral artesunate and artemether (4 mg kg(-1)) were compared in a randomized cross-over study of 14 adult patients in western Thailand with acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Antimalarial activity was compared using a previously validated, sensitive bioassay. RESULTS: Despite a 29% lower molar dose, oral artesunate administration resulted in significantly larger mean area under the plasma antimalarial activity time curve and median maximum plasma antimalarial activity than after oral artemether (P <or= 0.02). The mean (95% CI) oral antimalarial bioavailability of artemether, relative to oral artesunate, corrected for molar dose was 58 (40-76)%. The mean (95% CI) relative antimalarial bioavailability of artemether was lower on the first day of treatment, 31 (17-100)%, compared to the second day, 72 (44-118)% (P = 0.018). In vivo parasite clearance and time above the in vitro IC90 were similar for the two drugs, despite considerable differences in Cmax and AUC. CONCLUSIONS: The oral antimalarial bioavailability following artemether was significantly lower than that after artesunate. Artemether oral antimalarial bioavailability is reduced in acute malaria.
Authors: S Pukrittayakamee; S Looareesuwan; D Keeratithakul; T M Davis; P Teja-Isavadharm; B Nagachinta; A Weber; A L Smith; D Kyle; N J White Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1997 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: D B Bethell; P Teja-Isavadharm; X T Cao; T T Pham; T T Ta; T N Tran; T T Nguyen; T P Pham; D Kyle; N P Day; N J White Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 1997 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: J M Petras; D E Kyle; M Gettayacamin; G D Young; R A Bauman; H K Webster; K D Corcoran; J O Peggins; M A Vane; T G Brewer Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: K T Batty; L T Thu; T M Davis; K F Ilett; T X Mai; N C Hung; N P Tien; S M Powell; H V Thien; T Q Binh; N V Kim Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: P Newton; Y Suputtamongkol; P Teja-Isavadharm; S Pukrittayakamee; V Navaratnam; I Bates; N White Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: P Teja-Isavadharm; F Nosten; D E Kyle; C Luxemburger; F Ter Kuile; J O Peggins; T G Brewer; N J White Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: T T Hien; T M E Davis; L V Chuong; K F Ilett; D X T Sinh; N H Phu; C Agus; G M Chiswell; N J White; J Farrar Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ann K Miller; Nibedita Bandyopadhyay; Daniel G Wootton; Stephan Duparc; Paula L Kirby; Peter A Winstanley; Stephen A Ward Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2009-06-11 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Rahul P Bakshi; Elizabeth Nenortas; Abhai K Tripathi; David J Sullivan; Theresa A Shapiro Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Paktiya Teja-Isavadharm; James O Peggins; Thomas G Brewer; Nicholas J White; H Kyle Webster; Dennis E Kyle Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Miriam K Laufer; Phillip C Thesing; Fraction K Dzinjalamala; Osward M Nyirenda; Rhoda Masonga; Matthew B Laurens; Abbie Stokes-Riner; Terrie E Taylor; Christopher V Plowe Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kassoum Kayentao; Ogobara K Doumbo; Louis K Pénali; André T Offianan; Kirana M Bhatt; Joshua Kimani; Antoinette K Tshefu; Jack H T Kokolomami; Michael Ramharter; Pablo Martinez de Salazar; Alfred B Tiono; Alphonse Ouédraogo; Maria Dorina G Bustos; Frederick Quicho; Isabelle Borghini-Fuhrer; Stephan Duparc; Chang-Sik Shin; Lawrence Fleckenstein Journal: Malar J Date: 2012-10-31 Impact factor: 2.979