D M Lyons1, C Yang, A M Sawyer-Glover, M E Moseley, A F Schatzberg. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, 1201 Welch Rd, Medical School Laboratory Surge Bldg, Room P104-Mail Code 5485, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5485, USA. dmlyons@stanford.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Opportunities for research on the causes and consequences of stress-related hippocampal atrophy are limited in human psychiatric disorders. Therefore, this longitudinal study investigated early life stress and inherited variation in monkey hippocampal volumes. METHODS: Paternal half-siblings raised apart from one another by different mothers in the absence of fathers were randomized to 1 of 3 postnatal conditions that disrupted diverse aspects of early maternal care (n = 13 monkeys per condition). These conditions were previously shown to produce differences in social behavior, emotional reactivity, and neuroendocrine stress physiology. Hippocampal volumes were subsequently determined in adulthood by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Adult hippocampal volumes did not differ with respect to the stressful postnatal conditions. Based on paternal half-sibling effects, the estimated proportion of genetic variance, ie, heritability, was 54% for hippocampal size. Paternal half-siblings with small adult hippocampal volumes responded to the removal of all mothers after weaning with initially larger relative increases in cortisol levels. Plasma cortisol levels 3 and 7 days later, and measures of cortisol-negative feedback in adulthood were not, however, correlated with hippocampal size. CONCLUSIONS: In humans with mood and anxiety disorders, small hippocampal volumes have been taken as evidence that excessive stress levels of cortisol induce hippocampal volume loss. Results from this study of monkeys suggest that small hippocampi also reflect an inherited characteristic of the brain. Genetically informed clinical studies should assess whether inherited variation in hippocampal morphology contributes to excessive stress levels of cortisol through diminished neuroendocrine regulation.
BACKGROUND: Opportunities for research on the causes and consequences of stress-related hippocampal atrophy are limited in humanpsychiatric disorders. Therefore, this longitudinal study investigated early life stress and inherited variation in monkey hippocampal volumes. METHODS: Paternal half-siblings raised apart from one another by different mothers in the absence of fathers were randomized to 1 of 3 postnatal conditions that disrupted diverse aspects of early maternal care (n = 13 monkeys per condition). These conditions were previously shown to produce differences in social behavior, emotional reactivity, and neuroendocrine stress physiology. Hippocampal volumes were subsequently determined in adulthood by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Adult hippocampal volumes did not differ with respect to the stressful postnatal conditions. Based on paternal half-sibling effects, the estimated proportion of genetic variance, ie, heritability, was 54% for hippocampal size. Paternal half-siblings with small adult hippocampal volumes responded to the removal of all mothers after weaning with initially larger relative increases in cortisol levels. Plasma cortisol levels 3 and 7 days later, and measures of cortisol-negative feedback in adulthood were not, however, correlated with hippocampal size. CONCLUSIONS: In humans with mood and anxiety disorders, small hippocampal volumes have been taken as evidence that excessive stress levels of cortisol induce hippocampal volume loss. Results from this study of monkeys suggest that small hippocampi also reflect an inherited characteristic of the brain. Genetically informed clinical studies should assess whether inherited variation in hippocampal morphology contributes to excessive stress levels of cortisol through diminished neuroendocrine regulation.
Authors: Scott C Fears; William P Melega; Susan K Service; Chris Lee; Kelly Chen; Zhuowen Tu; Matthew J Jorgensen; Lynn A Fairbanks; Rita M Cantor; Nelson B Freimer; Roger P Woods Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2009-03-04 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Amanda S Hodel; Ruskin H Hunt; Raquel A Cowell; Sara E Van Den Heuvel; Megan R Gunnar; Kathleen M Thomas Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: David M Lyons; Karen J Parker; Jamie M Zeitzer; Christine L Buckmaster; Alan F Schatzberg Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-06-14 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Uma Rao; Li-Ann Chen; Anup S Bidesi; Mujeeb U Shad; M Albert Thomas; Constance L Hammen Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Jonathan A Oler; Andrew S Fox; Steven E Shelton; Jeffrey Rogers; Thomas D Dyer; Richard J Davidson; Wendy Shelledy; Terrence R Oakes; John Blangero; Ned H Kalin Journal: Nature Date: 2010-08-12 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Thomas Frodl; Markus Jäger; Ivana Smajstrlova; Christine Born; Ronald Bottlender; Tanja Palladino; Maximilian Reiser; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Eva M Meisenzahl Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 6.186