Literature DB >> 11734479

A prospective evaluation of untreated acute grade III acromioclavicular separations.

T F Schlegel1, R T Burks, R L Marcus, H K Dunn.   

Abstract

We prospectively studied the natural history of untreated acute grade III acromioclavicular separations. Twenty-five patients were treated nonoperatively with a sling for comfort through progressive early range of motion as tolerated. Ten additional uninjured subjects underwent strength testing to evaluate the difference between the dominant and nondominant sides so that patient data could be standardized. The patients were examined at intervals of 6, 12, 24, 36, and 52 weeks after injury, at which time they completed a subjective questionnaire and underwent isometric dynamometer testing as well as military press and bench press strength testing. One patient underwent a surgical procedure at 2 weeks after injury because of cosmetic concerns. Twenty of the 25 patients completed the 1-year evaluation and strength-testing protocol. Subjectively, 4 of the 20 patients (20%) thought that their long-term outcome was suboptimal, although for 3 of them it was not enough to warrant surgery. Objective examination and strength testing of the 20 patients revealed no limitation of shoulder motion in the injured extremity and no difference between sides in rotational shoulder muscle strength. The bench press was the only strength test that showed a significant short-term difference, with the injured extremity being an average of 17% weaker. This study documents the natural history of patients with an untreated acute grade III acromioclavicular separation and provides a reference with which to judge all other proposed methods of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11734479     DOI: 10.1177/03635465010290060401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  20 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular motion after surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Pierorazio Motta; Laura Bruno; Alberto Maderni; Piermario Tosco; Umberto Mariotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Managing and recognizing complications after treatment of acromioclavicular joint repair or reconstruction.

Authors:  Richard Ma; Patrick A Smith; Matthew J Smith; Seth L Sherman; David Flood; Xinning Li
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

3.  Acute management concepts of the acromioclavicular joint: a case report.

Authors:  Terry Malone
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-10

4.  Classifications in Brief: Rockwood Classification of Acromioclavicular Joint Separations.

Authors:  Jacob D Gorbaty; Jason E Hsu; Albert O Gee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  [Current aspects and new techniques in dislocation of the shoulder joint].

Authors:  J Abel; M A Zumstein; L Bolliger; M O Schär
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Coracoid clavicular tunnel angle is related with loss of reduction in a single-tunnel coracoclavicular fixation using a dog bone button in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Joong-Bae Seo; Dong-Ho Lee; Kyu-Beom Kim; Jae-Sung Yoo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Shoulder acromioclavicular joint reconstruction options and outcomes.

Authors:  Simon Lee; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

8.  Conservative management of a type III acromioclavicular separation: a case report and 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andrew J Robb; Scott Howitt
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2011-12

9.  [Injuries of the acromioclavicular joint in athletes].

Authors:  N Kraus; M Scheibel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Rockwood Grade-III Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Treatment Options.

Authors:  Sreten Franovic; Alex Pietroski; Noah Kuhlmann; Talal Bazzi; Yang Zhou; Stephanie Muh
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.