A L Tievsky1, T Ptak, J Farkas. 1. Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The various stages of multiple sclerosis (MS) are characterized by de- and remyelination as well as by inflammation. Diffusion MR imaging is sensitive to tissue water motion, which might correspond to these pathologic processes. Our purpose was to demonstrate differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and diffusion tensor anisotropy in acute and chronic MS plaques and in normal-appearing brain. METHODS: Twelve MS patients underwent conventional and full-tensor diffusion MR imaging with B = 1221 s/mm2. Derivation of trace ADC and calculation of anisotropic scalars, including eccentricity, relative anisotropy (RA), and fractional anisotropy (FA) was performed on a per-pixel basis. Regions of interest of plaques and normal structures were determined on coregistered maps. MS lesions were classified as acute, subacute, or chronic on the basis of their appearance on conventional images and in relation to clinical findings. RESULTS: Seven patients had acute plaques with a concentric arrangement of alternating high and low signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images. In nine acute lesions, plaque centers had high ADC with reduced anisotropy compared with rim, normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), and chronic lesions. The thin rim of diffusion-weighted hyperintensity surrounding the center showed variable ADC and anisotropic values, which were not statistically different from NAWM. Subacute and chronic MS lesions had intermediate ADC elevations/anisotropic reductions. Calculated FA pixel maps were superior to eccentricity or RA maps; however, quality was limited by signal-to-noise constraints. CONCLUSION: ADC and diffusion anisotropic scalars reflect biophysical changes in the underlying pathology of the demyelinating process.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The various stages of multiple sclerosis (MS) are characterized by de- and remyelination as well as by inflammation. Diffusion MR imaging is sensitive to tissue water motion, which might correspond to these pathologic processes. Our purpose was to demonstrate differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and diffusion tensor anisotropy in acute and chronic MS plaques and in normal-appearing brain. METHODS: Twelve MS patients underwent conventional and full-tensor diffusion MR imaging with B = 1221 s/mm2. Derivation of trace ADC and calculation of anisotropic scalars, including eccentricity, relative anisotropy (RA), and fractional anisotropy (FA) was performed on a per-pixel basis. Regions of interest of plaques and normal structures were determined on coregistered maps. MS lesions were classified as acute, subacute, or chronic on the basis of their appearance on conventional images and in relation to clinical findings. RESULTS: Seven patients had acute plaques with a concentric arrangement of alternating high and low signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images. In nine acute lesions, plaque centers had high ADC with reduced anisotropy compared with rim, normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), and chronic lesions. The thin rim of diffusion-weighted hyperintensity surrounding the center showed variable ADC and anisotropic values, which were not statistically different from NAWM. Subacute and chronic MS lesions had intermediate ADC elevations/anisotropic reductions. Calculated FA pixel maps were superior to eccentricity or RA maps; however, quality was limited by signal-to-noise constraints. CONCLUSION: ADC and diffusion anisotropic scalars reflect biophysical changes in the underlying pathology of the demyelinating process.
Authors: M A Horsfield; M Lai; S L Webb; G J Barker; P S Tofts; R Turner; P Rudge; D H Miller Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Derek Kenton Jones; Steve Charles Rees Williams; David Gasston; Mark Andrew Horsfield; Andrew Simmons; Robert Howard Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Marek Kubicki; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Stephan E Maier; Hatsuho Mamata; Melissa Frumin; Hal Ersner-Hershfield; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A Jolesz; Robert McCarley; Martha E Shenton Journal: Harv Rev Psychiatry Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: A Kunimatsu; O Abe; S Aoki; N Hayashi; T Okubo; T Masumoto; H Mori; T Yoshikawa; H Yamada; K Ohtomo Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2003-07-19 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: N Barakat; F B Mohamed; L N Hunter; P Shah; S H Faro; A F Samdani; J Finsterbusch; R Betz; J Gaughan; M J Mulcahey Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Laura Bonzano; Andrea Tacchino; Luca Roccatagliata; Giovanni Luigi Mancardi; Giovanni Abbruzzese; Marco Bove Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 5.038