Literature DB >> 11732090

Rates of movement and distribution of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster: in situ hybridization vs Southern blotting data.

X Maside1, C Bartolomé, S Assimacopoulos, B Charlesworth.   

Abstract

Genomic copy numbers and the rates of movement of nine families of transposable elements (TEs) of Drosophila melanogaster were estimated in two sets of mutation accumulation lines: Beltsville and Madrid. Southern blotting was used to screen a large number of samples from both genetic backgrounds for TEs. The Madrid lines were also screened by in situ hybridization of TEs to polytene chromosomes, in order to obtain more detailed information about the behaviour of TEs in the euchromatin. Southern blotting data provided evidence of insertions and excision events in both genetic backgrounds, occurring at rates of approximately 10(-5) and 10(-6) per element copy per generation, respectively. In contrast, in situ data from the Madrid background presented a completely different picture, with no evidence for excisions, and a significantly higher rate of transposition (1.01 x 10(-4)). Direct comparison of the two data sets suggests that the Southern blotting technique had serious deficiencies: (i) it underestimated element abundance; (ii) it revealed less than 30% of the new insertions detected by in situ hybridization; and (iii) changes in the size of restriction fragments from any source were spuriously identified as simultaneous insertion-excision events. Our in situ data are consistent with previous studies, and suggest that selection is the main force controlling element spread by transposition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11732090     DOI: 10.1017/s0016672301005201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  28 in total

Review 1.  What makes transposable elements move in the Drosophila genome?

Authors:  M P García Guerreiro
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Characterization of active R2 retrotransposition in the rDNA locus of Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; Thomas H Eickbush
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The dynamics of the roo transposable element in mutation-accumulation lines and segregating populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Montserrat Papaceit; Victoria Avila; Montserrat Aguadé; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Increase of the spontaneous mutation rate in a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Victoria Avila; David Chavarrías; Enrique Sánchez; Antonio Manrique; Carlos López-Fanjul; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Direct determination of the effects of genotype and extreme temperature on the transposition of roo in long-term mutation accumulation lines of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Fernando Vázquez; Jesús Albornoz; Ana Domínguez
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  Epigenetic silencing of transposable elements: a trade-off between reduced transposition and deleterious effects on neighboring gene expression.

Authors:  Jesse D Hollister; Brandon S Gaut
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  The effects of recombination rate on the distribution and abundance of transposable elements.

Authors:  Elie S Dolgin; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A Maximum-Likelihood Approach to Estimating the Insertion Frequencies of Transposable Elements from Population Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Jiang; Haixu Tang; Wazim Mohammed Ismail; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Genomic distribution of retrotransposons 297, 1731, copia, mdg1 and roo in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Authors:  Julia Díaz-González; Ana Domínguez; Jesús Albornoz
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Population dynamics of PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) and their targets in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jian Lu; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.