Literature DB >> 11731442

Replication protein A2 phosphorylation after DNA damage by the coordinated action of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and DNA-dependent protein kinase.

H Wang1, J Guan, H Wang1, A R Perrault, Y Wang, G Iliakis.   

Abstract

Replication protein A (RPA, also known as human single-stranded DNA-binding protein) is a trimeric, multifunctional protein complex involved in DNA replication, DNA repair, and recombination. Phosphorylation of the RPA2 subunit is observed after exposure of cells to ionizing radiation (IR) and other DNA-damaging agents, which implicates the modified protein in the regulation of DNA replication after DNA damage or in DNA repair. Although ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) phosphorylate RPA2 in vitro, their role in vivo remains uncertain, and contradictory results have been reported. Here we show that RPA2 phosphorylation is delayed in cells deficient in one of these kinases and completely abolished in wild-type, ATM, or DNA-PK-deficient cells after treatment with wortmannin at a concentration-inhibiting ATM and DNA-PK. Caffeine, an inhibitor of ATM and ATM-Rad3 related (ATR) but not DNA-PK, generates an ataxia-telangiectasia-like response in wild-type cells, prevents completely RPA2 phosphorylation in DNA-PKcs deficient cells, but has no effect on ataxia-telangiectasia cells. These observations rule out ATR and implicate both ATM and DNA-PK in RPA2 phosphorylation after exposure to IR. UCN-01, an inhibitor of protein kinase C, Chk1, and cyclin-dependent kinases, has no effect on IR-induced RPA2 phosphorylation. Because UCN-01 abrogates checkpoint responses, this observation dissociates RPA2 phosphorylation from checkpoint activation. Phosphorylated RPA has a higher affinity for nuclear structures than unphosphorylated RPA suggesting functional alterations in the protein. In an in vitro assay for DNA replication, DNA-PK is the sole kinase phosphorylating RPA2, indicating that processes not reproduced in the in vitro assay are required for RPA2 phosphorylation by ATM. Because RPA2 phosphorylation kinetics are distinct from those of the S phase checkpoint, we propose that DNA-PK and ATM cooperate to phosphorylate RPA after DNA damage to redirect the functions of the protein from DNA replication to DNA repair.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11731442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  48 in total

1.  BMI1-mediated histone ubiquitylation promotes DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Ismail Hassan Ismail; Christi Andrin; Darin McDonald; Michael J Hendzel
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 10.539

2.  Expression of the adenovirus E4 34k oncoprotein inhibits repair of double strand breaks in the cellular genome of a 293-based inducible cell line.

Authors:  Elham S Mohammadi; Elizabeth A Ketner; David C Johns; Gary Ketner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Rapid activation of ATR by ionizing radiation requires ATM and Mre11.

Authors:  Jeremy S Myers; David Cortez
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity.

Authors:  Karlene A Cimprich; David Cortez
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 5.  More forks on the road to replication stress recovery.

Authors:  Chris Allen; Amanda K Ashley; Robert Hromas; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.216

6.  RECQ1 is required for cellular resistance to replication stress and catalyzes strand exchange on stalled replication fork structures.

Authors:  Venkateswarlu Popuri; Deborah L Croteau; Robert M Brosh; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  DNA-PK phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser4/Ser8 regulates replication stress checkpoint activation, fork restart, homologous recombination and mitotic catastrophe.

Authors:  Amanda K Ashley; Meena Shrivastav; Jingyi Nie; Courtney Amerin; Kyle Troksa; Jason G Glanzer; Shengqin Liu; Stephen O Opiyo; Diana D Dimitrova; Phuong Le; Brock Sishc; Susan M Bailey; Greg G Oakley; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-05-10

8.  Interplay of DNA damage and cell cycle signaling at the level of human replication protein A.

Authors:  Gloria E O Borgstahl; Kerry Brader; Adam Mosel; Shengqin Liu; Elisabeth Kremmer; Kaitlin A Goettsch; Carol Kolar; Heinz-Peter Nasheuer; Greg G Oakley
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-06-13

9.  Structure of the herpes simplex virus 1 genome: manipulation of nicks and gaps can abrogate infectivity and alter the cellular DNA damage response.

Authors:  Samantha Smith; Nina Reuven; Kareem N Mohni; April J Schumacher; Sandra K Weller
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Ionizing radiation-dependent and independent phosphorylation of the 32-kDa subunit of replication protein A during mitosis.

Authors:  Holger Stephan; Claire Concannon; Elisabeth Kremmer; Michael P Carty; Heinz-Peter Nasheuer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.