Literature DB >> 11730257

Biochemical markers of bone turnover in men.

P Szulc1, P D Delmas.   

Abstract

Although osteoporosis in men has been recently recognized as a public health problem, the mechanisms leading to bone loss are still poorly understood. Longitudinal studies of bone mineral density suggest an acceleration of bone loss after 70 years of age. Histomorphometric data concerning age-related changes of bone turnover in men are limited, including few men over 70 years and have been restricted to the trabecular envelope of bone biopsies. Most measurements of biochemical markers of bone turnover have been performed in small cohorts of limited age range, and results obtained in large cohorts are scanty. Levels of markers of bone formation and of bone resorption are very high in men aged 20-30 years which corresponds to the late phase of formation of peak bone mass, and then declines, reaching their lowest levels between 50 and 60 years. Data on bone turnover markers in elderly men are discordant. Concentrations of bone formation markers remain stable, decrease slightly, or even increase marginally. Markers of bone resorption increase in some studies, mainly after 70 years of age, in line with acceleration of bone loss in this age range. This discordance between studies can result from different reasons. The increase of bone turnover may be limited to a subgroup of elderly men. In addition, urinary levels of bone resorption markers depend on the rate of bone turnover, on pre-renal and renal catabolism of peptides released from bone matrix, on glomerular filtration rate, as well as unit of expression of their results (per 24 hours per urinary creatinine mass, per glomerular filtrate volume). In elderly men, biochemical bone markers are negatively correlated with bone mineral density. Longitudinal studies are not yet available on the relationship among bone turnover markers, rate of bone loss, and fracture. In conclusion, in elderly men, age-related bone loss seems to result from increased bone resorption which is not matched by increased bone formation. Thus, antiresorptive therapy may be of interest in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in men. Further studies are necessary to determine if bone resorption markers predict the risk of fragility fractures in elderly men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11730257     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-001-1059-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  20 in total

1.  Heterogeneity of biological bone markers in idiopathic male osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michel Laroche
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Contribution of bone turnover markers to the variation in bone mineral density: a study in Vietnamese men and women.

Authors:  L T Nguyen; U D T Nguyen; T D T Nguyen; L T Ho-Pham; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Impact of smoking on bone mineral density and bone metabolism in elderly men: the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) study.

Authors:  J Tamaki; M Iki; Y Fujita; K Kouda; A Yura; E Kadowaki; Y Sato; J S Moon; K Tomioka; N Okamoto; N Kurumatani
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover: part I: biochemistry and variability.

Authors:  Markus J Seibel
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2005-11

Review 5.  Strontium ranelate: an effective solution for diverse fracture risks.

Authors:  J D Ringe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Biochemical markers of aging for longitudinal studies in humans.

Authors:  Peter M Engelfriet; Eugène H J M Jansen; H Susan J Picavet; Martijn E T Dollé
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Unusual association between increased bone resorption and presence of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria phenotype in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Evangelos Terpos; Michalis Samarkos; Christos Meletis; Effie Apostolidou; Maria Tsironi; Konstantinos Korovesis; Despina Mavrogianni; Nora Viniou; John Meletis
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.490

8.  Treatment of osteoporosis in men with bisphosphonates: rationale and latest evidence.

Authors:  Ie-Wen Sim; Peter R Ebeling
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.346

9.  Relative contributions of multiple determinants to bone mineral density in men.

Authors:  G R Chiu; A B Araujo; T G Travison; S A Hall; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Male osteoporosis: A review.

Authors:  Antonio Herrera; Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Jesús Mateo; Jorge Gil; Elena Ibarz; Luis Gracia
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.