Literature DB >> 11729697

Characteristics of responding-, nonresponding- and refusing-parents in an adolescent lifestyle choice study.

J R Baker1, J K Yardley, K McCaul.   

Abstract

The acquisition of a random sample is one of the many methodological problems that arise when conducting research with adolescent populations. Frequently, due to ethical considerations associated with collecting data from adolescents, active parental consent procedures are required. The current study examined characteristics of parents who consented, refused consent, or did not respond to an active consent request for their children to participate in a large-scale study of adolescent lifestyle behaviors. Results indicated nonresponding-parents were more likely to be employed than consenting-parents. Further, differences were found for a number of attitudinal variables and about the importance of adolescent research. There were significant differences between refusing-parents, and consenting- and nonresponding-parents who were similar in their attitudes toward adolescent research. The findings suggest that nonresponding-parents are characteristically more similar to consenting-parents than to refusing-parents, which supports the use of passive consent procedures as a reasonable alternative to requiring active parental consent in adolescent research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11729697     DOI: 10.1177/0193841X0102500602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Rev        ISSN: 0193-841X


  8 in total

1.  The use of harmful legal products among pre-adolescent Alaskan students.

Authors:  Brian Saylor; Melodie Fair; Shannon Deike-Sims; Knowlton Johnson; Kristen Ogilvie; David Collins
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.228

2.  Design and implementation of an effective telephone counseling intervention for adolescent smoking cessation.

Authors:  Kathleen A Kealey; Evette J Ludman; Patrick M Marek; Sue L Mann; Jonathan B Bricker; Arthur V Peterson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Group-randomized trial of a proactive, personalized telephone counseling intervention for adolescent smoking cessation.

Authors:  Arthur V Peterson; Kathleen A Kealey; Sue L Mann; Patrick M Marek; Evette J Ludman; Jingmin Liu; Jonathan B Bricker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Management of Adolescent-Parent Dyads' Discordance for Willingness to Participate in a Reproductive Health Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jenny K R Francis; Lauren Dapena Fraiz; Ariel M de Roche; Marina Catallozzi; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-12-10       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Written parental consent in school-based HIV/AIDS prevention research.

Authors:  Catherine Mathews; Sally J Guttmacher; Alan J Flisher; Yolisa Mtshizana; Andiswa Hani; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Reducing adolescent use of harmful legal products: intermediate effects of a community prevention intervention.

Authors:  Paul J Gruenewald; Knowlton Johnson; Stephen R Shamblen; Kristen A Ogilvie; David Collins
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.164

7.  The impact of active consent procedures on nonresponse and nonresponse error in youth survey data: evidence from a new experiment.

Authors:  Matthew W Courser; Stephen R Shamblen; Paul J Lavrakas; David Collins; Paul Ditterline
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2009-06-08

8.  Changes to the law on consent in South Africa: implications for school-based adolescent sexual and reproductive health research.

Authors:  Melanie Zuch; Amanda J Mason-Jones; Catherine Mathews; Lesley Henley
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2012-04-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.