Literature DB >> 11724729

Gene recognition in eukaryotic DNA by comparison of genomic sequences.

P S Novichkov1, M S Gelfand, A A Mironov.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Sequencing of complete eukaryotic genomes and large syntenic fragments of genomes makes it possible to apply genomic comparison for gene recognition.
RESULTS: This paper describes a spliced alignment algorithm that aligns candidate exon chains of two homologous genomic sequence fragments from different species. The algorithm is implemented in Pro-Gen software. Unlike other algorithms, Pro-Gen does not assume conservation of the exon-intron structure. Amino acid sequences obtained by the formal translation of candidate exons are aligned instead of nucleotide sequences, which allows for distant comparisons. The algorithm was tested on a sample of human-mammal (mouse), human-vertebrate (Xenopus ) and human-invertebrate (Drosophila ) gene pairs. Surprisingly, the best results, 97-98% correlation between the actual and predicted genes, were obtained for more distant comparisons, whereas the correlation on the human-mouse sample was only 93%. The latter value increases to 95% if conservation of the exon-intron structure is assumed. This is caused by a large amount of sequence conservation in non-coding regions of the human and mouse genes probably due to regulatory elements. AVAILABILITY: Pro-Gen v. 3.0 is available to academic researchers free of charge at http://www.anchorgen.com/pro_gen/pro_gen.html.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11724729     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.11.1011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  7 in total

1.  Gene structure conservation aids similarity based gene prediction.

Authors:  Irmtraud M Meyer; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  EUGENE'HOM: A generic similarity-based gene finder using multiple homologous sequences.

Authors:  Sylvain Foissac; Philippe Bardou; Annick Moisan; Marie-Josée Cros; Thomas Schiex
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Current methods of gene prediction, their strengths and weaknesses.

Authors:  Catherine Mathé; Marie-France Sagot; Thomas Schiex; Pierre Rouzé
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  AGenDA: gene prediction by cross-species sequence comparison.

Authors:  Leila Taher; Oliver Rinner; Saurabh Garg; Alexander Sczyrba; Burkhard Morgenstern
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Rodent-specific alternative exons are more frequent in rapidly evolving genes and in paralogs.

Authors:  Ramil N Nurtdinov; Andrey A Mironov; Mikhail S Gelfand
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Conserved and species-specific alternative splicing in mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Ramil N Nurtdinov; Alexey D Neverov; Alexander V Favorov; Andrey A Mironov; Mikhail S Gelfand
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Assessing the impact of comparative genomic sequence data on the functional annotation of the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Casey M Bergman; Barret D Pfeiffer; Diego E Rincón-Limas; Roger A Hoskins; Andreas Gnirke; Chris J Mungall; Adrienne M Wang; Brent Kronmiller; Joanne Pacleb; Soo Park; Mark Stapleton; Kenneth Wan; Reed A George; Pieter J de Jong; Juan Botas; Gerald M Rubin; Susan E Celniker
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-12-30       Impact factor: 13.583

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.