Literature DB >> 11721242

Outcomes assessment in hand surgery: when are they meaningful?

R M Szabo1.   

Abstract

Hand surgeons currently are challenged with the task of measuring and establishing the connection between the diagnosis and treatment of health-related quality-of-life problems. Although true quality of life cannot be measured directly, instruments in the form of questionnaires have been developed that use self-reporting to account for functional performance, health status, and health-related quality of life. Instruments must be reliable, valid, responsive, and appropriate. Misunderstanding these properties often hinders interpreting the recent stream of outcome studies in the literature. Most physicians are not sure what if any outcome information should be collected routinely or if any outcome instrument is diagnostically useful. Currently there is no convincing evidence to support the routine use of patient-based outcome measures in hand surgeons' practices. Those hand surgeons who would like to carry out an outcome study should consider seeking help from others with expertise in outcomes design and analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11721242     DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.29487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  18 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of Non Diseased Specified Outcome Measures in Hand Injuries to Assess Activity and Participation Based on ICF Content.

Authors:  Maryam Farzad; Fereydoun Layeghi; Ali Asgari; Seyed Ali Hosseini; Mehdi Rassafiani
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2013-12-25

2.  Critical analysis of outcome measures used in the assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; P Priyanka; Arif Gul; Balakrishnan Ilango
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Outcomes Assessment After Hand Burns.

Authors:  Shepard P Johnson; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 1.907

4.  How much are upper or lower extremity disabilities associated with general health status in the elderly?

Authors:  Young Hak Roh; Ki Woong Kim; Nam-Jong Paik; Tae Kyun Kim; Hyun Sik Gong
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Validity and responsiveness of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test.

Authors:  Erika Davis Sears; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  To what degree do shoulder outcome instruments reflect patients' psychologic distress?

Authors:  Young Hak Roh; Jung Ho Noh; Joo Han Oh; Goo Hyun Baek; Hyun Sik Gong
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Measuring outcomes in hand surgery.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.017

8.  Review of thumb carpometacarpal arthritis classification, treatment and outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua Gillis; Kevin Calder; Jason Williams
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2011

Review 9.  How to use outcomes questionnaires: pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Sunitha Malay; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.017

10.  Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery.

Authors:  Catherine R McMillan; Paul A Binhammer
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.