Literature DB >> 11719653

Multi-detector row spiral CT pulmonary angiography: comparison with single-detector row spiral CT.

V Raptopoulos1, P M Boiselle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare vascular conspicuity and ability to connect pulmonary arterial branches on pulmonary angiograms obtained with helical multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) with those on pulmonary angiograms obtained with helical single-detector row CT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 93 consecutive patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism, 48 underwent scanning with multi-detector row CT and 45 with single-detector row CT; scans were obtained in 9 seconds and 28 seconds with 2.5-mm and 3.0-mm collimation, respectively. The lungs were divided into three zones: central, middle, and peripheral. Two independent observers used five-point grading scales.
RESULTS: Conspicuity of pulmonary arteries in the central zone was ranked equal (median of 5), but in the middle and peripheral zones it was significantly higher at multi-detector row CT than at single-detector row CT (median 5 vs 4 and 4 vs 3, P < .001, respectively). In addition, multi-detector row CT improved the ability to connect peripheral arteries with their more centrally located pulmonary artery of origin in the peripheral but not the middle zone on transverse images and in both zones on multiplanar images. Viewing with a modified window setting (width, 1,000 HU; level, -100 HU) significantly increased pulmonary arterial conspicuity. Contrast material column in the pulmonary arteries was significantly more homogeneous at multi-detector row CT.
CONCLUSION: Use of multi-detector row CT significantly improves pulmonary arterial visualization in the middle and peripheral lung zones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11719653     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2213010473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  28 in total

1.  British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Pulmonary embolism: is multislice CT the method of choice? For.

Authors:  Ieneke J C Hartmann; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Contrast-enhanced MDCT of the thorax.

Authors:  A F Kopp; A Küttner; T Trabold; M Heuschmid; S Schröder; C D Claussen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Cardiac and vascular MDCT: thoracic imaging.

Authors:  Andreas F Kopp; Axel Küttner; Tobias Trabold; Martin Heuschmid; Stephen Schröder; C D Claussen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  CTPA as the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Rosa M Estrada-Y-Martin; Sandra A Oldham
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Optimisation of contrast medium volume and injection-related factors in CT pulmonary angiography: 64-slice CT study.

Authors:  Selma Uysal Ramadan; Pinar Kosar; Iclal Sonmez; Sevilay Karahan; Ugur Kosar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Reproducibility of multi-detector spiral computed tomography in detection of sub-segmental acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  S Brunot; O Corneloup; V Latrabe; M Montaudon; F Laurent
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Multidetector-row CT of the appendix in healthy adults.

Authors:  Pamela T Johnson; John Eng; Carolyn J Moore; Karen M Horton; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-07-04

9.  MDCT for suspected pulmonary embolism: multi-institutional survey of 16-MDCT data acquisition protocols.

Authors:  Pamela T Johnson; David Naidich; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-11-29

10.  Images of a pulmonary embolus: classic and contemporary.

Authors:  Iain D C Kirkpatrick; Michael P Meyers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.