J Horiguchi1, T Nakanishi, K Ito. 1. Department of Radiology, Hiroshima University School of Medicine, 1-2-3, Kasumi-cho, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the quality of and motion artifacts on multidetector CT scans and to compare the results with those of and on electron beam CT scans for the assessment of coronary calcium scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, 20 volunteers were scanned using multidetector CT. We compared the signal-to-noise ratio in the heart, motion artifacts at the heart border, and the highest CT values in the regions of the coronary arteries using single-sector and multisector reconstruction algorithms. Next, 60 patients with coronary calcified deposits underwent both multidetector CT and electron beam CT. We compared coronary calcium scores determined with multidetector CT using the two algorithms (thresholds of 90 and 130 H) with those determined using electron beam CT. RESULTS: The signal-to-noise ratio was higher and motion artifacts were reduced when we used the multisector algorithm. The highest CT value in the region of the coronary arteries exceeded 90 H in one of 55 arteries on the multisector algorithm images and 17 of 55 arteries on single-sector algorithm images (chi-square test, p < 0.01). In coronary calcium scoring, correlation coefficients ranged from 0.920 to 0.992 (Pearson's product moment) and from 0.932 to 0.969 (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient). CONCLUSION: Multidetector CT with a retrospective ECG-gating algorithm (multisector reconstruction) produced cardiac images with fewer motion artifacts and showed a high correlation with coronary calcium scores determined using electron beam CT. Therefore, multidetector CT is a potential tool for coronary calcium scoring.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the quality of and motion artifacts on multidetector CT scans and to compare the results with those of and on electron beam CT scans for the assessment of coronary calcium scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, 20 volunteers were scanned using multidetector CT. We compared the signal-to-noise ratio in the heart, motion artifacts at the heart border, and the highest CT values in the regions of the coronary arteries using single-sector and multisector reconstruction algorithms. Next, 60 patients with coronary calcified deposits underwent both multidetector CT and electron beam CT. We compared coronary calcium scores determined with multidetector CT using the two algorithms (thresholds of 90 and 130 H) with those determined using electron beam CT. RESULTS: The signal-to-noise ratio was higher and motion artifacts were reduced when we used the multisector algorithm. The highest CT value in the region of the coronary arteries exceeded 90 H in one of 55 arteries on the multisector algorithm images and 17 of 55 arteries on single-sector algorithm images (chi-square test, p < 0.01). In coronary calcium scoring, correlation coefficients ranged from 0.920 to 0.992 (Pearson's product moment) and from 0.932 to 0.969 (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient). CONCLUSION: Multidetector CT with a retrospective ECG-gating algorithm (multisector reconstruction) produced cardiac images with fewer motion artifacts and showed a high correlation with coronary calcium scores determined using electron beam CT. Therefore, multidetector CT is a potential tool for coronary calcium scoring.
Authors: Georg Mühlenbruch; Ernst Klotz; Joachim E Wildberger; Ralf Koos; Marco Das; Matthias Niethammer; Christian Hohl; Dagmar Honnef; Christoph Thomas; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-07-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Georg Mühlenbruch; Christian Hohl; Marco Das; Joachim E Wildberger; Christoph Suess; Ernst Klotz; Thomas Flohr; Ralf Koos; Christoph Thomas; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-02-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Philipp G C Begemann; Udo van Stevendaal; Ralph Koester; Andreas H Mahnken; Andreas Koops; Gerhard Adam; Michael Grass; Claus Nolte-Ernsting Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Noortje van der Bijl; Paul W de Bruin; Jacob Geleijns; Jeroen J Bax; Joanne D Schuijf; Albert de Roos; Lucia J M Kroft Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 2.357