Literature DB >> 11716427

Varus tibial joint line obliquity: a potential cause of femoral component malrotation.

M W Pagnano1, A D Hanssen.   

Abstract

In 60 consecutive total knee arthroplasties done in 52 patients with primary osteoarthritis and varus or neutral tibiofemoral alignment, the posterior condylar angle was calculated intraoperatively and averaged 3.98 degrees (range, 0 degrees-9 degrees). Eighteen knees had a posterior condylar angle value less than 3 degrees whereas 27 knees had a posterior condylar angle value of 5 degrees or greater. Final rotational alignment of the femoral component was set parallel to the transepicondylar axis. Only one of these 60 knees required a lateral retinacular release for proper patellar tracking during the knee arthroplasty. When compared with three previously defined angles measured on the radiographs taken preoperatively, only the tibial plateau-tibial shaft angle values were correlated significantly with the value of the posterior condylar angle. As the tibial varus joint line obliquity increased, there was a distinct tendency for the transepicondylar axis to be rotated more externally relative to the posterior condylar axis. This variance suggests that the use of the posterior condylar axis as a rotational reference is inappropriate in many knees with arthritis with varus or neutral tibiofemoral alignment. In particular, varus tibial joint line obliquity of more than 4 degrees increases the likelihood of femoral component malrotation when the posterior femoral condyles are used to reference femoral component rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11716427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  Native femoral sulcus as a guide for the position of the femoral component in primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study of 420 knees.

Authors:  Fang-Yao Chiu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Inter-observer precision and physiologic variability of mri landmarks used to determine rotational alignment in conventional and patient-specific TKA.

Authors:  Andrew Park; Denis Nam; Michael V Friedman; Stephen T Duncan; Travis J Hillen; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Analysis of the Geometry of the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia in the Osteoarthritic Knee: A 3D Reconstruction CT Scan Based Study of 449 Cases.

Authors:  Dimitrios N Lyras; Craig Loucks; Robert Greenhow
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-04

4.  The flexion space is more reliably balanced when using the transepicondylar axis as compared to the posterior condylar line.

Authors:  Scott R Nodzo; Vincenzo Franceschini; Diego Sanchez Cruz; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Patient-specific instrumentation combined with a new tool for gap balancing is useful in total knee replacement: a 3-year follow-up of a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ting Deng; Tangyou Liu; Qing Lei; Lihong Cai; Song Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 6.  Gap balancing vs. measured resection technique in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian K Daines; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-02-14

7.  Relationship between the height of fibular head and the incidence and severity of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Xinghui Xu; Jin Yang; Jun Li; Deping Yao; Pan Deng; Boliang Chen; Yifei Liu
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2022-07-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.