Literature DB >> 11715076

Reflexive spatial orienting of tactile attention.

C Spence1, F P McGlone.   

Abstract

We investigated the covert reflexive (exogenous) orienting of tactile spatial attention. Participants made speeded discrimination responses (up vs down) to a series of tactile targets presented randomly to the index finger or thumb of either hand. These targets were preceded at a variable stimulus onset asynchrony (200, 300, or 400 ms) by a spatially nonpredictive tactile cue (presented to both finger and thumb of one or other hand) on either the same or opposite side as the target. Tactile elevation discrimination responses were more rapid and accurate when the cue and target appeared on the same side than when they appeared on opposite sides. Our results provide the first direct empirical evidence that tactile spatial attention can be reflexively directed toward peripheral tactile cues leading to the facilitation of subsequent responses to stimuli presented at that body site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11715076     DOI: 10.1007/s002210100883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  10 in total

1.  Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows.

Authors:  Giovanni Galfano; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Competition between auditory and visual spatial cues during visual task performance.

Authors:  Thomas Koelewijn; Adelbert Bronkhorst; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  An attentional approach to study mental representations of different parts of the hand.

Authors:  Germán Gálvez-García; Alyanne M De Haan; Juan Lupiañez; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-11

4.  Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Daniel Sanabria; Gemma A Calvert; Charles Spence
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Spatial attention modulates tactile change detection.

Authors:  Lore Van Hulle; Stefaan Van Damme; Charles Spence; Geert Crombez; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant.

Authors:  Ann-Katrin Wesslein; Charles Spence; Christian Frings
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-06

7.  Cross-modal cueing effects of visuospatial attention on conscious somatosensory perception.

Authors:  Deniz Doruk; Lorena Chanes; Alejandra Malavera; Lotfi B Merabet; Antoni Valero-Cabré; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-04-30

8.  Motor (but not auditory) attention affects syntactic choice.

Authors:  Mikhail Pokhoday; Christoph Scheepers; Yury Shtyrov; Andriy Myachykov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Tactile angle discriminability improvement: roles of training time intervals and different types of training tasks.

Authors:  Wu Wang; Jiajia Yang; Yinghua Yu; Qiong Wu; Jiabin Yu; Satoshi Takahashi; Yoshimichi Ejima; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The Impact of Enhancing Phone Activeness on the Negative Effect Induced by the Presence of a Cell Phone.

Authors:  Wenjuan Liu; Akihiko Dempo; Kazumitsu Shinohara
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.