BACKGROUND: Multi-dose dry-powder inhalers are perceived as being easier for patients to use than conventional pressurized aerosol inhalers; however, no study has determined whether patients handle such devices adequately and whether there is a need for patient education in this area. METHOD: We used trained observers to assess the handling of a specific multi-dose dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler; AstraZeneca Canada; Mississauga, ON) by patients currently using the device for the management of their asthma. Fourteen discrete steps were scored independently by two observers simultaneously. Patients were divided into two groups for analysis: those who had received formal instruction in the use of the inhaler at The Asthma Centre and those who had received no formal instruction in the community. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the formally trained groups and control groups in the percentage of handling steps performed correctly (79% vs 78%, respectively; p > 0.05). Fewer than 50% of patients in both groups demonstrated optimal breath-holding when using the device. CONCLUSION: Patient handling of Turbuhaler was generally good, with no evidence that a structured education intervention offered an advantage over the usual education incidental to the prescribing or dispensing process. The most common handling flaw, suboptimal breath-holding, is not specific to this device and is of uncertain clinical significance.
BACKGROUND: Multi-dose dry-powder inhalers are perceived as being easier for patients to use than conventional pressurized aerosol inhalers; however, no study has determined whether patients handle such devices adequately and whether there is a need for patient education in this area. METHOD: We used trained observers to assess the handling of a specific multi-dose dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler; AstraZeneca Canada; Mississauga, ON) by patients currently using the device for the management of their asthma. Fourteen discrete steps were scored independently by two observers simultaneously. Patients were divided into two groups for analysis: those who had received formal instruction in the use of the inhaler at The Asthma Centre and those who had received no formal instruction in the community. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the formally trained groups and control groups in the percentage of handling steps performed correctly (79% vs 78%, respectively; p > 0.05). Fewer than 50% of patients in both groups demonstrated optimal breath-holding when using the device. CONCLUSION:Patient handling of Turbuhaler was generally good, with no evidence that a structured education intervention offered an advantage over the usual education incidental to the prescribing or dispensing process. The most common handling flaw, suboptimal breath-holding, is not specific to this device and is of uncertain clinical significance.
Authors: Mariam Toumas-Shehata; David Price; Iman Amin Basheti; Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 2.871
Authors: Henry Chrystyn; Job van der Palen; Raj Sharma; Neil Barnes; Bruno Delafont; Anadi Mahajan; Mike Thomas Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 2.871
Authors: Josep Darbà; Gabriela Ramírez; Antoni Sicras; Pablo Francoli; Saku Torvinen; Rainel Sánchez-de la Rosa Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2015-10-29